Size | Price | Stock | Qty |
---|---|---|---|
1mg |
|
||
5mg |
|
||
10mg |
|
||
Other Sizes |
|
ADME/Pharmacokinetics |
Absorption, Distribution and Excretion
Both vitamin D2 & vitamin D3 are absorbed from the small intestine, although vitamin D3 may be absorbed more efficiently. The exact portion of the gut that is most effective in vitamin D absorption reflects the vehicle in which the vitamin is dissolved. Most of the vitamin appears first within chylomicrons in lymph. The presence of bile is required for absorption of ergocalciferol and the extent of GI absorption may be decreased in patients with hepatic, biliary, or GI disease (e.g., Crohn's disease, Whipple's disease, sprue). A longitudinal, randomized, double blind, placebo controlled study was conducted for 6 months to monitor ultraviolet B light exposure in human milk-fed infants both with and without supplemental vitamin D2, and to measure longitudinally the bone mineral content, growth, and serum concentrations of calcium, phosphorus, 25-hydroxyvitamin D3, 25-hydroxyvitamin D2, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D, and parathyroid hormone. Sequential sampling was performed of 46 human milk-fed white infants; 24 received 400 IU/day of vitamin D2, and 22 received placebo. An additional 12 patients were followed who received standard infant formula. 83% of patients completed a full 6 months of the study. Ultraviolet B light exposure and measurements of growth did not differ between groups. At 6 months, the human milk groups did not differ significantly in bone mineral content or serum concentrations of parathyroid hormone or 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D, although total 25-hydroxyvitamin D values were significantly less in the unsupplemented human milk group (23.53 + or - 9.94 vs 36.96 + or - 11.86 ng/ml; p< 0.01). However, 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 serum concentrations were significantly higher in the unsupplemented human milk-fed group compared with the supplemented group (21.77 + or - 9.73 vs 11.74 + or - 10.27 ng/ml, p< 0.01) by 6 months of age. It was concluded that unsupplemented, human milk-fed infants had no evidence of vitamin D deficiency during the first 6 months of life. A comparison was made of the ability of ergocalciferol and cholecalciferol to elevate plasma concentrations of vitamin D and 25-hydroxyvitamin D in cats. Cholecalciferol, given as an oral bolus in oil, resulted in a rapid elevation of plasma concentration of cholecalciferol followed by a rapid decline. In contrast, 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration in plasma increased until day 3 after administration and remained elevated for a further 5 days. When 337 microg of both cholecalciferol and ergocalciferol in oil were given as an oral bolus to 10 cats, the peak plasma concentrations of cholecalciferol and ergocalciferol occurred at 8 or 12 h after administration. Peak concentrations of cholecalciferol were over twice those of ergocalciferol (570 +/- 80 vs. 264 +/- 42 nmol/l). The area under the curve 0-169 h for cholecalciferol was also more than twice that for ergocalciferol. When ergocalciferol and cholecalciferol were administered in a parenteral oil-based emulsion, higher concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 than 25-hydroxyvitamin D2 were maintained in plasma. When both vitamins were included in the diet in the nutritional range, plasma concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D2 were 0.68 of those of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3. Discrimination against ergocalciferol by cats appears to result from differences in affinity of the binding protein for the metabolites of the two forms of vitamin D. These results indicate that cats discriminate against ergocalciferol, and use it with an efficiency of 0.7 of that of cholecalciferol to maintain plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration. Osteoporosis diminishes the quality of life in adults with cystic fibrosis (CF). Vitamin D deficiency resulting from malabsorption may be a factor in the etiology of low bone mineral density (BMD) in patients with CF. OBJECTIVE: Absorption of oral ergocalciferol (vitamin D2) and the consequent response of 25-hydroxyvitamin D in 10 adults with CF and exocrine pancreatic insufficiency was compared with that of 10 healthy control subjects. DESIGN: In this pharmacokinetic study, CF patients and control subjects were pair-matched on age, sex, and race. Each subject consumed 2500 microg oral vitamin D2 with a meal. The CF group also took pancreatic enzymes that provided > or = 80000 U lipase. Blood samples were obtained at baseline and at 5, 10, 24, 30, and 36 h after vitamin D2 consumption to measure serum vitamin D2 and 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations. RESULTS: Vitamin D2 concentrations in all subjects were near zero at baseline. CF patients absorbed less than one-half the amount of oral vitamin D2 that was absorbed by control subjects (P < 0.001). Absorption by the CF patients varied greatly; 2 patients absorbed virtually no vitamin D2. The rise in 25-hydroxyvitamin D in response to vitamin D2 absorption was significantly lower over time in the CF group than in the control group (P = 0.0012). CONCLUSIONS: Vitamin D2 absorption was significantly lower in CF patients than in control subjects. These results may help explain the etiology of vitamin D deficiency in CF patients, which may contribute to their low BMD. Metabolism / Metabolites Vitamin D ... is hydroxylated at the 25 position in liver to produce 25-hydroxy-vitamin D3 which is the major metabolite circulating in the plasma. The metabolite is further hydroxylated in the kidney to 1,25-dihydroxy-vitamin D3, the most active metabolite in initiating intestinal transport of calcium & phosphate & mobilization of mineral from bone. A polar, biologically active metabolite of vitamin D2, 25-hydroxyergocalciferol, which is about 1.5 times more active in curing rickets in rats, has been isolated from pig plasma. Dihydrotachysterol is a vitamin D analog that may be regaurded as a reduction product of vitamin D2 ... Dihydrotachysterol is about 1/450 as active as vitamin D in the antirachitic assay, but at high doses it is much more effective than vitamin D in mobilizing bone mineral. Biological Half-Life 19 to 48 hours (however, stored in fat deposits in body for prolonged periods). |
---|---|
Toxicity/Toxicokinetics |
Effects During Pregnancy and Lactation
◉ Summary of Use during Lactation Vitamin D is a normal component of human milk. Daily maternal vitamin D2 or D3 supplementation in the 10 to 50 mcg (400 to 2,000 IU) range produces milk concentrations that are inadequate to deliver the daily requirement to an exclusively breastfed infant, and inadequate to correct pre-existing infant vitamin D deficiency through breastfeeding alone. Breastfeeding mothers who take vitamin D supplements in this range should give their infants a daily vitamin D supplement of at least 10 mcg (400 IU) to meet pediatric nutritional guidelines. Daily maternal vitamin D dosages at or above 100 mcg (4,000 IU) achieve milk levels can potentially meet the 10 mcg daily infant goal intake, depending on the mother's underlying vitamin D status and daily infant milk intake. Obese mothers may have higher requirements. ◉ Effects in Breastfed Infants Maternal daily doses of 400 to 6,400 IU (10 to 160 mcg) have not been associated with any short-term biochemical abnormalities in breastfed infants. An 11-day-old, exclusively breastfed, term, female neonate experienced asymptomatic, mild hypercalcemia (total serum calcium 11.4 mg/dL). The mother was taking maintenance vitamin D2 100,000 IU daily to maintain normal calcium and phosphorus status after a pre-pregnancy thyroid-parathyroidectomy, plus a prenatal vitamin containing 400 IU daily vitamin D (form not specified) during pregnancy and lactation. Vitamin D2 and 25-OH-vitamin D2 levels in cord blood and in milk at 14 days of age were both markedly elevated. Serum vitamin D levels were not measured in the infant. The combination of high daily breastmilk vitamin D2 intake plus a high infant serum level present at birth likely contributed to the abnormal calcium value. In a study in northern India, short-term maternal use of oral 60,000 IU vitamin D3 once daily for 10 days beginning after birth was not associated with any differences in serum calcium or phosphorus levels, or of urinary calcium/creatinine ratios, in their exclusively breastfed infants at 14 weeks and 6 months of age compared to infants of mothers given placebo. Infants of mothers given vitamin D had a lower frequency of biochemical rickets compared to placebo (0 vs 17%), but no difference in the frequency of radiological rickets (3.6% vs 3.4%). One hundred fifty-two mothers in northern India, most of whom were vitamin D deficient, were randomized to receive 120,000 IU (3000 mcg) of vitamin D one time within 7 days postpartum followed by the same dose at 6, 10, and 14 weeks postpartum to coincide with scheduled infant immunization, or placebo. Infants of mothers in the placebo group received 400 IU (10 mcg) of daily vitamin D while those in the treatment group received placebo. At 14 weeks, infant growth parameters and serum biochemical indicators of bone mineral and liver homeostasis were similar between the two groups. At 9 months, dental growth and diarrheal or respiratory illness frequency were also not different. One hundred fourteen vitamin D deficient mothers in northern India were randomized to receive vitamin D3 60,000 IU (1,500 mcg) or placebo as a single dose starting between 24 and 48 hours after delivery, and then repeated at 6, 10, and 14 weeks postpartum. Over 90% of participants were exclusively breastfeeding. At 6 months of age, 6 infants in the control group and no infants in the treatment group developed biochemical rickets, while 2 infants and 1 infant, respectively, developed radiological rickets. Infants of mothers in the treatment group reportedly had normal serum calcium and phosphorus concentrations at 6 months of age, although specific results were not given, and this outcome was not reported for the control group. One hundred ninety mothers in Qatar were randomized to receive either 600 IU or 6000 IU vitamin D beginning within 4 weeks postpartum. Infants of the mothers in the low-dose group were given 400 IU daily while those in the high-dose group received daily placebo. At the scheduled 4- and 7-month postpartum study visits, infant growth parameters, serum calcium and parathyroid hormone levels, and parent reported infant health status, were not different between the two groups. Two hundred twenty healthy, non-obese, breastfeeding mothers in Rajasthan, India were randomized to receive 120,000 IU or 12,000 IU of vitamin D3 once a month for 12 months beginning in the first postpartum month. Infants in both groups had normal serum calcium, phosphate, and alkaline phosphate levels at baseline and at 12 months. There was no significant differences in growth parameters, bone mineral content or density between the two groups at 12 months. One thousand three hundred pregnant women in Dhaka, Bangladesh were randomized to receive an oral tablet of 4,200 IU, 16,800 IU, 28,000 IU of vitamin D3, or placebo once weekly beginning prenatally between 17- and 24-weeks gestational age. The placebo group and some in the 28,000 IU group continued to receive their assigned treatment for 26 weeks postpartum while the others stopped treatment after delivery. Baseline maternal vitamin D status was similar across all participants with 65% being biochemically vitamin D deficient. The median duration of exclusive breastfeeding was 12 to 14 weeks and was similar between each of the groups. Infant vitamin D supplementation was uncommon (<10%). One thousand one hundred sixty-four infants were available for analysis. There were no differences between the groups in infant growth at 1 year postpartum. There were also no differences in infant mortality, hospitalizations, respiratory tract infections, serum calcium status, or early childhood bone mineral density and grip strength. Infant hypercalcemia and hypercalciuria occurred rarely (≤1%) and did not differ between groups. Radiologically confirmed rickets occurred in 4 infants (0.3%), 3 in the placebo group and 1 in the lowest dose group. However, a difference between the groups could not be determined due to such a low incidence. The frequency of infant biochemical rickets at 6 months of age was significantly higher in the placebo group (7.9%) compared to the high-dose group (1.3%), but not compared to the other groups. One hundred forty-eight exclusively breastfeeding postpartum patients were given either 400 or 6,400 IU daily of vitamin D3 beginning within 4 to 6 weeks of delivery. Average baseline infant serum 25-OH-vitamin D was <50 nmol/L (range undetectable to 113.8 nmol/L). Infants of mothers in the 400 IU daily group were given a 400 IU daily vitamin D supplement, while those in the 6,400 IU daily group were given placebo. There were no differences between the two groups in biochemical markers of calcium status, bone mineral content or density at 1, 4, or 7 months of age. Emerging evidence suggests adequate infant delivery of vitamin D through breastmilk from maternal supplementation during pregnancy and lactation is important for regulation of the developing infant immune system. ◉ Effects on Lactation and Breastmilk Relevant published information was not found as of the revision date. |
Additional Infomation |
Ergocalciferol appears as odorless white crystals. Used as a dietary supplement and food additive. (EPA, 1998)
5,6-trans-Vitamin D2 is a vitamin D. 5,6-trans-Vitamin D2 has been reported in Humulus lupulus and Homo sapiens with data available. See also: Ergocalciferol (annotation moved to). Mechanism of Action The mechanism of action of calcitriol, the activated form of vitamin D, resembles that of the steroid and thyroid hormones. Thus, calcitriol binds to cytosolic receptors within target cells, and the receptor-hormone complex interacts with the DNA of certain genes to either enhance or inhibit their transcription. Structural analysis of the calcitriol receptor indicates that it belongs to the same supergene family as the steroid receptors. Calcitriol also appears to exert a few effects that occur too rapidly to be explained by genomic actions. /Calcitriol/ The mechanisms responsible for mobilization of bone salts have been only partially defined, and the interaction of multiple factors appears to be involved. Paradoxically, the cells responsible for bone resorption (osteoclasts) are not directly acted upon by calcitriol and do not appear to contain calcitriol receptors. Instead, calcitriol causes an increase in the number of osteoclasts available to resorb bone; this may result from an action upon myeloid hematopoietic precursor cells that are induced to differentiate toward functional osteoclasts. The cells responsible for bone formation (osteoblasts) do contain receptors, and calcitriol causes them to elaborate several proteins, including osteocalcin, a vitamin K-dependent protein that contains gamma-carboxyglutamic acid residues. The exact role of this protein is not known, but other unidentified substances are also elaborated that appear to stimulate the function of osteoclasts. In addition, calcitriol acts synergistically with gamma-interferon to increase the production of interleukin-1, a lymphokine that promotes bone resorption. |
Molecular Formula |
C28H44O
|
---|---|
Molecular Weight |
396.64836
|
Exact Mass |
396.339
|
CAS # |
51744-66-2
|
Related CAS # |
Vitamin D2;50-14-6
|
PubChem CID |
6536972
|
Appearance |
Prisms from acetone
White crystals Colorless crystals |
Melting Point |
239 to 244 °F (EPA, 1998)
116.5 °C |
LogP |
7.641
|
Hydrogen Bond Donor Count |
1
|
Hydrogen Bond Acceptor Count |
1
|
Rotatable Bond Count |
5
|
Heavy Atom Count |
29
|
Complexity |
678
|
Defined Atom Stereocenter Count |
6
|
SMILES |
[C@@H](C)(/C=C/[C@@H](C(C)C)C)[C@]1(CC[C@@]2([C@]1(C)CCC/C/2=C\C=C1\C(=C)CC[C@H](O)C\1)[H])[H]
|
InChi Key |
MECHNRXZTMCUDQ-VLOQVYPSSA-N
|
InChi Code |
InChI=1S/C28H44O/c1-19(2)20(3)9-10-22(5)26-15-16-27-23(8-7-17-28(26,27)6)12-13-24-18-25(29)14-11-21(24)4/h9-10,12-13,19-20,22,25-27,29H,4,7-8,11,14-18H2,1-3,5-6H3/b10-9+,23-12+,24-13+/t20-,22+,25-,26+,27-,28+/m0/s1
|
Chemical Name |
(1S,3E)-3-[(2E)-2-[(1R,3aS,7aR)-1-[(E,2R,5R)-5,6-dimethylhept-3-en-2-yl]-7a-methyl-2,3,3a,5,6,7-hexahydro-1H-inden-4-ylidene]ethylidene]-4-methylidenecyclohexan-1-ol
|
HS Tariff Code |
2934.99.9001
|
Storage |
Powder -20°C 3 years 4°C 2 years In solvent -80°C 6 months -20°C 1 month Note: (1). This product requires protection from light (avoid light exposure) during transportation and storage. (2). Please store this product in a sealed and protected environment (e.g. under nitrogen), avoid exposure to moisture. |
Shipping Condition |
Room temperature (This product is stable at ambient temperature for a few days during ordinary shipping and time spent in Customs)
|
Solubility (In Vitro) |
DMSO : ~25 mg/mL (~63.03 mM)
|
---|---|
Solubility (In Vivo) |
Solubility in Formulation 1: ≥ 2.5 mg/mL (6.30 mM) (saturation unknown) in 10% DMSO + 40% PEG300 + 5% Tween80 + 45% Saline (add these co-solvents sequentially from left to right, and one by one), clear solution.
For example, if 1 mL of working solution is to be prepared, you can add 100 μL of 25.0 mg/mL clear DMSO stock solution to 400 μL PEG300 and mix evenly; then add 50 μL Tween-80 to the above solution and mix evenly; then add 450 μL normal saline to adjust the volume to 1 mL. Preparation of saline: Dissolve 0.9 g of sodium chloride in 100 mL ddH₂ O to obtain a clear solution. Solubility in Formulation 2: 2.5 mg/mL (6.30 mM) in 10% DMSO + 90% (20% SBE-β-CD in Saline) (add these co-solvents sequentially from left to right, and one by one), suspension solution; with ultrasonication. For example, if 1 mL of working solution is to be prepared, you can add 100 μL of 25.0 mg/mL clear DMSO stock solution to 900 μL of 20% SBE-β-CD physiological saline solution and mix evenly. Preparation of 20% SBE-β-CD in Saline (4°C,1 week): Dissolve 2 g SBE-β-CD in 10 mL saline to obtain a clear solution. View More
Solubility in Formulation 3: ≥ 2.5 mg/mL (6.30 mM) (saturation unknown) in 10% DMSO + 90% Corn Oil (add these co-solvents sequentially from left to right, and one by one), clear solution. |
Preparing Stock Solutions | 1 mg | 5 mg | 10 mg | |
1 mM | 2.5211 mL | 12.6056 mL | 25.2111 mL | |
5 mM | 0.5042 mL | 2.5211 mL | 5.0422 mL | |
10 mM | 0.2521 mL | 1.2606 mL | 2.5211 mL |
*Note: Please select an appropriate solvent for the preparation of stock solution based on your experiment needs. For most products, DMSO can be used for preparing stock solutions (e.g. 5 mM, 10 mM, or 20 mM concentration); some products with high aqueous solubility may be dissolved in water directly. Solubility information is available at the above Solubility Data section. Once the stock solution is prepared, aliquot it to routine usage volumes and store at -20°C or -80°C. Avoid repeated freeze and thaw cycles.
Calculation results
Working concentration: mg/mL;
Method for preparing DMSO stock solution: mg drug pre-dissolved in μL DMSO (stock solution concentration mg/mL). Please contact us first if the concentration exceeds the DMSO solubility of the batch of drug.
Method for preparing in vivo formulation::Take μL DMSO stock solution, next add μL PEG300, mix and clarify, next addμL Tween 80, mix and clarify, next add μL ddH2O,mix and clarify.
(1) Please be sure that the solution is clear before the addition of next solvent. Dissolution methods like vortex, ultrasound or warming and heat may be used to aid dissolving.
(2) Be sure to add the solvent(s) in order.