Size | Price | Stock | Qty |
---|---|---|---|
1mg |
|
||
5mg |
|
||
10mg |
|
||
Other Sizes |
|
Targets |
Natural alkaloid; anti-inflammatory; anti-parasitic
|
---|---|
ln Vitro |
Tetrahydrocoptisine (THC) significantly inhibited LPS-induced TNF-α, interleukin-6(IL-6) and nitric oxide (NO) production. THC inhibited the production of TNF-α and IL-6 by down-regulating LPS-induced IL-6 and TNF-α mRNA expression. Furthermore, it attenuated the phosphorylation of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (p38MAPK) and phosphorylation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase1/2 (ERK1/2) as well as the expression of nuclear factor kappa B(NF-κB), in a concentration-dependent manner. Taken together, our data suggest that THC is an active anti-inflammatory constituent by inhibition of TNF-α, IL-6 and NO production possibly via down-regulation of NF-κB activation, phospho-ERK1/2 and phospho-p38MAPK signal pathways[1].
|
ln Vivo |
The extracts or constituents from Corydalis impatiens are known to have many pharmacological activities. Tetrahydrocoptisine (THC), a protoberberine compound from Corydalis impatiens, was found to possess a potent anti-inflammatory effect in different acute or chronic inflammation model animals. Pretreatment with THC (i.p.) inhibited the paw and ear edema in the carrageenan-induced paw edema assay and xylene-induced ear edema assay, respectively. In the lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced systemic inflammation model, THC significantly inhibited serum tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) release in mice [1].
Excessive alcohol consumption can lead to gastric ulcer and the present work was aimed to examine the protective effect of tetrahydrocoptisine (THC) in the model of ethanol-induced gastric ulcer in mice. Fasted mice treated with ethanol 75% (0.5ml/100g) were pre-treated with THC (10 or 20mg/kg, ip), cimetidine (100mg/kg, ip) or saline in different experimental sets for a period of 3days, and animals were euthanized 4h after ethanol ingestion. Gross and microscopic lesions, immunological and biochemical parameters were taken into consideration. The results showed that ethanol induced gastric damage, improving nitric oxide (NO) level, increased pro-inflammatory cytokine (TNF-α and IL-6) levels and myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity, as well as the expression of nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) in the ethanol group. Pretreatment of THC at doses of 10 and 20mg/kg bodyweight significantly attenuated the gastric lesions as compared to the ethanol group. These results suggest that the gastroprotective activity of THC is attributed to reducing NO production and adjusting the pro-inflammatory cytokine, inhibited neutrophil accumulation and NF-κB expression[2]. |
Enzyme Assay |
Assay of myeloperoxidase in gastric tissue[2]
Myeloperoxidase, an enzyme found primarily in neutrophil azurophilic granules, has been used extensively as a biochemical marker for granulocyte infiltration into various tissues, including the gastrointestinal tract (Costa et al., 2013, Krawisz et al., 1984). MPO activity was determined using an MPO activity measurement kit by adding 0.2 ml of o-dianisidine hydrochloride and 0.0005% hydrogen peroxide to 4 ml buffer containing 0.2 ml homogenates. MPO activity was assayed at room temperature by measuring the increase in absorbance at 460 nm due to the fluorescent product oxidized by the H2O2-generated redox intermediate. MPO activities were expressed as units per gram of tissue. Cytokine evaluations in gastric tissue[2] The cytokine levels of IL-6 and TNF-α in gastric tissue were evaluated using ELISA kits according to the manufacturer's instructions. Supernatant of homogenates or cytokine standards (100 μl) were respectively loaded into each well and then followed with biotin conjugated secondary antibodies. To obtain color reaction, streptavidin–HRP and substrate solution were added. The absorbance was measured at 450 nm with an ELISA reader. A standard curve was run on each assay plate using recombinant IL-6 and TNF-α in serial dilution. The results were expressed pg/mg tissue. Determination of NO level in gastric tissue[2] The level of nitric oxide in the gastric tissue was evaluated as total nitrate/nitrite using Griess reagent (Green et al., 1982) and the operational processes were measured in accordance with the NO kit instructions. Briefly, 50 μl of tissue supernatant was added to 50 μl Griess reagent [0.1% N-(1-naphthyl) ethylenediamine dihydrochloride, 1% sulphanilamide and 2.5% H3PO4] and mixed. After incubation at room temperature for 10 min, the absorbance was measured at 540 nm. The results were expressed as μmol/g protein. Cytokine evaluations in serum[2] The levels of cytokines (IL-6 and TNF-α) in the serum were analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using ELISA kits for rats according to the manufacturer's instructions. The results were expressed as pg/ml serum. |
Animal Protocol |
Ethanol-induced gastric mucosal damage[2]
Mice were randomly divided into five experimental groups, each containing ten animals. The normal and ulcer control groups received vehicle (0.9% saline) throughout the course of the experiments. The prevention groups received (ip) different doses of THC (10 and 20 mg/kg, dissolved in 0.9% saline) and cimetidine (100 mg/kg, reference drug, dissolved in 0.9% saline) respectively for a period of 3 days. After fasting for 24 h prior to the experiment, mice were fed orally with 75% ethanol (0.5 ml/100 g body weight) to induce the acute ulcer, while the normal group received water only (Mei et al., 2012). Four hours after induction, blood samples were collected from the retro-orbital plexus of each animal and were then centrifuged for 10 min at 2500 g to obtain clear sera which were stored at − 80 °C before use (Choi et al., 2010). After the mice were euthanized, the stomachs were rapidly removed, opened along the greater curvature and rinsed with ice-cold saline to remove the gastric contents and blood clots in order to assess the extent of gastric damage. Thereafter, each stomach was dichotomised, with one moiety of stomach immersed in 10% formaldehyde for histological evaluation and gastric tissue from the other moiety stored at − 80 °C for biochemical determinations.[2] Determination of gastric ulcer index[2] The degree of gastric mucosal damage was evaluated from digital pictures, and rated for gross pathology according to the ulcer score scales as previously described (Salga et al., 2012). The lesions were scored as follows: 0: no lesions; 0.5: slight hyperemia or ≤ 5 petechiae; 1: ≤ 5 erosions ≤ 5 mm in length; 1.5: ≤ 5 erosions ≤ 5 mm in length and many petechiae; 2: 6–10 erosions ≤ 5 mm in length; 2.5: 1–5 erosions > 5 mm in length; 3: 5–10 erosions > 5 mm in length; 3.5: > 10 erosions > 5 mm in length; 4: 1–3 erosions ≤ 5 mm in length and 0.5–1 mm in width; 4.5: 4–5 erosions ≤ 5 mm in length and 0.5–1 mm in width; 5: 1–3 erosions > 5 mm in length and 0.5–1 mm in width; 6: 4 or 5 grade 5 lesions; and 7: ≥ 6 grade 5 lesions; 8: complete lesion of the mucosa with hemorrhage.. The sum of the total scores was divided by the number of animals to obtain the mean ulcer index for each group. |
References |
|
Molecular Formula |
C19H18CLNO4
|
---|---|
Molecular Weight |
359.80
|
Exact Mass |
359.092
|
CAS # |
96087-21-7
|
Related CAS # |
(±)-Stylopine;4312-32-7;(-)-Stylopine;84-39-9; 84-39-9 (S-isomer); 4312-32-7 (racemic); 7461-02-1 (racemic)
|
PubChem CID |
131864060
|
Appearance |
Typically exists as white to off-white solids at room temperature
|
Source |
Corydalis tubers
|
Hydrogen Bond Donor Count |
1
|
Hydrogen Bond Acceptor Count |
5
|
Rotatable Bond Count |
0
|
Heavy Atom Count |
25
|
Complexity |
502
|
Defined Atom Stereocenter Count |
0
|
SMILES |
Cl.O1COC2C1=CC1CCN3CC4C(CC3C=1C=2)=CC=C1C=4OCO1
|
InChi Key |
WZUQSTMUNWBERD-UHFFFAOYSA-N
|
InChi Code |
InChI=1S/C19H17NO4.ClH/c1-2-16-19(24-10-21-16)14-8-20-4-3-12-6-17-18(23-9-22-17)7-13(12)15(20)5-11(1)14;/h1-2,6-7,15H,3-5,8-10H2;1H
|
Chemical Name |
5,7,17,19-tetraoxa-13-azahexacyclo[11.11.0.02,10.04,8.015,23.016,20]tetracosa-2,4(8),9,15(23),16(20),21-hexaene;hydrochloride
|
Synonyms |
Stylopine hydrochloride; 96087-21-7; 5,7,17,19-tetraoxa-13-azahexacyclo[11.11.0.02,10.04,8.015,23.016,20]tetracosa-2,4(8),9,15(23),16(20),21-hexaene;hydrochloride; ( inverted exclamation markA)-Stylopine (hydrochloride); 6,7,12b,13-Tetrahydro-4H-[1,3]dioxolo[4',5':7,8]isoquinolino[3,2-a][1,3]dioxolo[4,5-g]isoquinoline hydrochloride; DL-Stylopine (hydrochloride); HY-N0924A; AKOS040758819;
|
HS Tariff Code |
2934.99.9001
|
Storage |
Powder -20°C 3 years 4°C 2 years In solvent -80°C 6 months -20°C 1 month Note: Please store this product in a sealed and protected environment (e.g. under nitrogen), avoid exposure to moisture and light. |
Shipping Condition |
Room temperature (This product is stable at ambient temperature for a few days during ordinary shipping and time spent in Customs)
|
Solubility (In Vitro) |
DMSO : 2 mg/mL (5.56 mM)
H2O : < 0.1 mg/mL |
---|---|
Solubility (In Vivo) |
Note: Listed below are some common formulations that may be used to formulate products with low water solubility (e.g. < 1 mg/mL), you may test these formulations using a minute amount of products to avoid loss of samples.
Injection Formulations
Injection Formulation 1: DMSO : Tween 80: Saline = 10 : 5 : 85 (i.e. 100 μL DMSO stock solution → 50 μL Tween 80 → 850 μL Saline)(e.g. IP/IV/IM/SC) *Preparation of saline: Dissolve 0.9 g of sodium chloride in 100 mL ddH ₂ O to obtain a clear solution. Injection Formulation 2: DMSO : PEG300 :Tween 80 : Saline = 10 : 40 : 5 : 45 (i.e. 100 μL DMSO → 400 μLPEG300 → 50 μL Tween 80 → 450 μL Saline) Injection Formulation 3: DMSO : Corn oil = 10 : 90 (i.e. 100 μL DMSO → 900 μL Corn oil) Example: Take the Injection Formulation 3 (DMSO : Corn oil = 10 : 90) as an example, if 1 mL of 2.5 mg/mL working solution is to be prepared, you can take 100 μL 25 mg/mL DMSO stock solution and add to 900 μL corn oil, mix well to obtain a clear or suspension solution (2.5 mg/mL, ready for use in animals). View More
Injection Formulation 4: DMSO : 20% SBE-β-CD in saline = 10 : 90 [i.e. 100 μL DMSO → 900 μL (20% SBE-β-CD in saline)] Oral Formulations
Oral Formulation 1: Suspend in 0.5% CMC Na (carboxymethylcellulose sodium) Oral Formulation 2: Suspend in 0.5% Carboxymethyl cellulose Example: Take the Oral Formulation 1 (Suspend in 0.5% CMC Na) as an example, if 100 mL of 2.5 mg/mL working solution is to be prepared, you can first prepare 0.5% CMC Na solution by measuring 0.5 g CMC Na and dissolve it in 100 mL ddH2O to obtain a clear solution; then add 250 mg of the product to 100 mL 0.5% CMC Na solution, to make the suspension solution (2.5 mg/mL, ready for use in animals). View More
Oral Formulation 3: Dissolved in PEG400  (Please use freshly prepared in vivo formulations for optimal results.) |
Preparing Stock Solutions | 1 mg | 5 mg | 10 mg | |
1 mM | 2.7793 mL | 13.8966 mL | 27.7932 mL | |
5 mM | 0.5559 mL | 2.7793 mL | 5.5586 mL | |
10 mM | 0.2779 mL | 1.3897 mL | 2.7793 mL |
*Note: Please select an appropriate solvent for the preparation of stock solution based on your experiment needs. For most products, DMSO can be used for preparing stock solutions (e.g. 5 mM, 10 mM, or 20 mM concentration); some products with high aqueous solubility may be dissolved in water directly. Solubility information is available at the above Solubility Data section. Once the stock solution is prepared, aliquot it to routine usage volumes and store at -20°C or -80°C. Avoid repeated freeze and thaw cycles.
Calculation results
Working concentration: mg/mL;
Method for preparing DMSO stock solution: mg drug pre-dissolved in μL DMSO (stock solution concentration mg/mL). Please contact us first if the concentration exceeds the DMSO solubility of the batch of drug.
Method for preparing in vivo formulation::Take μL DMSO stock solution, next add μL PEG300, mix and clarify, next addμL Tween 80, mix and clarify, next add μL ddH2O,mix and clarify.
(1) Please be sure that the solution is clear before the addition of next solvent. Dissolution methods like vortex, ultrasound or warming and heat may be used to aid dissolving.
(2) Be sure to add the solvent(s) in order.