CK1δ (IC5 = 40 nM)

The tested cell lines' growth was decreased by IWP-2 within a single digit μM range. For A818-6, MiaPaCa2, Panc-1, Panc-89, HT29, HEK293, SW620, and Capan cells, IWP-2 reduces cell proliferation with EC50s of 8.96 μM, 1.90 μM, 2.33 μM, and 3.86 μM, 4.67 μM, 2.76, respectively. 1.90 μM, 2.05 μM, and 1.90 μM[2]. Panc-1 cells were either left untreated or given 2.33 μM IWP-2 for a 48-hour period. When compared to untreated cells, the peak activity of CK1δ kinase in IWP-2-treated cells was roughly 66% of residual activity. In Panc1 cells, IWP-2 decreases CK1δ activity [2].

In order to assess the effectiveness of IWP-2 in vivo, C57BL/6 mice were intraperitoneally injected with 200 μL of either free liposomes or IWP-2-liposomes for around two hours, and then a comparable volume of blue dye filling was added. rubber beads or E. Coli DH5α. The uptake of blue beads and E was significantly reduced as a result of IWP-2. Coli as measured over a 2-hour period by CFU in peritoneal lavage cells. Moreover, the related mice's lavage fluid had 2-4 times lower levels of TNF-α and IL-6 than the control values. Even the release of the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 is markedly increased by IWP-2 [3].

In Vitro Kinase Assays[2]
In vitro kinase assays were performed with different CK1 isoforms and IWP derivatives (such as IWP-2) at an ATP concentration of 10 μM and using DMSO controls as described previously. Where indicated, higher ATP concentrations (50, 100, 250, and 500 μM) were used. Bovine GST-CK1α (FP296), rat recombinant CK1δ kinase domain (CK1δKD), rat GST-wtCK1δ (FP449), rat GST-M82FCK1δ (FP1153), recombinant human CK1ε, TLK2, and ZAP70 were used as sources of enzyme. Phosphorylated proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE and stained with Coomassie. α-Casein served as a substrate for most kinase assay reactions. Kinase assays performed with ZAP70 were done using poly(l-glutamic acid-l-tyrosine) as substrate. Phosphate incorporation was detected by autoradiography of dried gels. The phosphorylated protein bands were cut out and quantified by Cherenkov counting. Dose–response analyses were carried out using GraphPad Prism 6 statistical software.

---

High-Throughput Kinase Profiling[2]
The residual activity of 320 eukaryotic kinases was measured by ProQinase GmbH in the presence of compounds IWP-2 and 19 (1 μM). Dendrograms illustrating the phylogenetic relations of the kinases were generated using TREEspotTM Software Tool Image and reprinted with permission from KINOMEscan.

Cell Viability Assay[1]
Cells were seeded at a concentration of 5 × 104 cells/mL in 96-well cell culture plates and allowed to attach overnight at 37 °C and 5% CO2. To investigate the effects of compounds on cancer cell proliferation, cells were treated with various concentrations (ranging from 0.313 μM to 10 μM) of inhibitor, with untreated and DMSO-treated cells serving as a control. After an incubation period of 48 h at 37 °C, 10 μL of a MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) 12 mM solution in PBS were added, followed by further incubation for 4 h at 37 °C. Media containing MTT was then removed carefully, and 100 μL of 0.04 N HCl in isopropanol was added. To dissolve the formazan crystals, the plates were placed for 30 min on an orbital shaker. The resulting purple solution was spectrophotometrically measured at 570 nm. Experiments were repeated at least three times with four replicates per assay.

---

Fractionation of Cell Extracts by FPLC.[1]
IWP-2-treated (EC50 = 2,33 μM) and DMSO-treated Panc1 cells were lysed in sucrose lysis buffer. Total protein extract (1.4 mg) was diluted in prefiltered FPLC buffer A (50 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.5, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 5% (v/v) glycerol, 0.03% (v/v) Brij-35, 1 mM benzamidine, 25 μg/mL aprotinin, 0.1% (v/v) β-mercaptoethanol). Cell lysates were then passed through a 0.45 μm filter and injected into an anion exchange column attached to an EttanLC FPLC system. Proteins bound to the cationic surfaces of the column were eluted with a linear ascending NaCl gradient by gradually increasing percentage of FPLC buffer B (equal to buffer A plus 1 M NaCl). Fractions of 250 μL volume were collected. Three μL from selected protein fractions were used for in vitro kinase assays, as described above, to determine CK1-specific kinase activity. To confirm CK1 in the peak fraction, kinase assays were repeated in the presence of given concentrations of CK1δ-specific inhibitors IC261 and PF670462. DMSO was used as a control and GST-p531–64 as substrate.

---

Dual Luciferase Reporter Gene Assay[1]
The assay was performed as described previously. Briefly, compounds were tested in HEK293T cells in a 96-well plate format. For transient transfection, Lipofectamine2000 and plasmids were pre-incubated in Opti-MEM medium for 15 min at room temperature. For the autocrine/paracrine assay setup, 3 × 106 cells (for one 96-well plate) were transfected with the Wnt3A-expressing vector and the Super(8x)TOPflash reporter vector together with the TK-Renilla luciferase control vector for internal luminescence normalization purposes, followed by incubation for 8 h. Transfected cells were harvested and seeded on 96-well plates in 110 μL media at 25,000 cells per well and allowed to adhere for 1 h. Cells were treated either with 10 μL of compound dilution (final concentrations 5, 2.5, 1, 0.5, 0.1, 0.05, 0.01, 0.001, 0.001 μM with 0.5% DMSO) or DMSO (0.5%) as the vehicle controls. For paracrine pathway activation, cells were stimulated by addition of Wnt3A-conditioned medium that was freshly harvested from mouse L-cells overexpressing the Wnt protein (L-Wnt3A). Control cells were treated with L-cell medium. Transfection of cells was done with the same vectors as described above, except for the Wnt3A-expressing vector. Cells were seeded in 80 μL and 25,000 cells/well 12 h post-transfection before stimulation with 30 μL of Wnt3A-conditioned medium. Compound treatment was conducted as described above. After 22 h incubation, the medium was carefully aspirated and both luciferase activities measured using the Dual-GloLuciferase Assay System according to the manufacturer’s protocol on a Tecan-Infinite 200 Plate Reader. Data were processed by normalizing Firefly with Renilla luciferase signals from each well. Each condition was repeated in technical triplicates with at least two independent biological replicates. EC50 and IC50 values were calculated by nonlinear regression analysis using the GraphPad Prism 5 software (version 5.03).

Mice Infection. [3]
About 3-mo-old C57BL/6 mice were were housed four to five in a cage at 23 °C in a 12-h light/dark cycle. Mice were injected intraperitoneally (i.p.) first with either 200 µL of liposome-IWP-2 (LI) or liposome (L) and then after 2 h with 1 × 108 or 2 × 108 CFU E. coli in 200 µL of sterile PBS. After 2 h or 24 h mice were killed, and the peritoneal cavity was washed with 5 mL of sterile ice-cold PBS. The peritoneal lavage fluid was centrifuged at 300 × g for 5 min, the cell pellet was resuspended in RPMI 1640 complete medium, and the supernatant was used for cytokine assay. For ex vivo experiments, peritoneal phagocytes were isolated as above from normal mice, and equal numbers of cells were plated in medium overnight at 37 °C in 5% CO2 before performing further experiments.

Preparation of Liposome-IWP-2. [3]
Liposome-IWP-2 was prepared with L-α-phosphatidylcholine, octadecylamine, and IWP-2 in a 20:2:0.1 ratio (100 µg of IWP-2 was used). The lipid mixture was dissolved in 1 mL of chloroform, and the solvent was evaporated under low pressure by a rotatory evaporator. The thin dry film was dispersed in 1 mL PBS, and the suspension was sonicated for 30 s twice in an ultrasonicator. Liposome with entrapped IWP-2 was separated from excess free drug by two successive washings in PBS with ultracentrifugation (100,000 × g, 30 min, and 4 °C). Control liposome was prepared similarly without adding IWP-2. [3]

---

Mice: About 3-mo-old C57BL/6 mice are housed four to five in a cage at 23°C in a 12-h light/dark cycle. Mice are injected intraperitoneally (i.p.) first with either 200 μL of liposome-IWP-2 (LI) or liposome (L) and then after 2 h with 1×108 or 2×108 CFU E. coli in 200 μL of sterile PBS. After 2 h or 24 h mice are killed, and the peritoneal cavity is washed with 5 mL of sterile ice-cold PBS. The peritoneal lavage fluid is centrifuged at 300× g for 5 min, the cell pellet is resuspended in RPMI 1640 complete medium, and the supernatant is used for cytokine assay. For ex vivo experiments, peritoneal phagocytes are isolated as above from normal mice, and equal numbers of cells are plated in medium overnight at 37°C in 5% CO2 before performing further experiments.

Mice and rats

[1]. Chen B, et al. Small molecule-mediated disruption of Wnt-dependent signaling in tissue regeneration and cancer. Nat Chem Biol. 2009 Feb;5(2):100-7.
[2]. García-Reyes B, et al. Discovery of Inhibitor of Wnt Production 2 (IWP-2) and Related Compounds As Selective ATP-Competitive Inhibitors of Casein Kinase 1 (CK1) δ/ε. J Med Chem. 2018 May 10;61(9):4087-4102.
[3]. Maiti G, et al. The Wingless homolog Wnt5a stimulates phagocytosis but not bacterial killing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Oct 9;109(41):16600-5

N-(6-methyl-1,3-benzothiazol-2-yl)-2-[(4-oxo-3-phenyl-6,7-dihydrothieno[3,2-d]pyrimidin-2-yl)thio]acetamide is an organonitrogen heterocyclic compound, an organic heterobicyclic compound and an organosulfur heterocyclic compound.

---

The pervasive influence of secreted Wnt signaling proteins in tissue homeostasis and tumorigenesis has galvanized efforts to identify small molecules that target Wnt-mediated cellular responses. By screening a diverse synthetic chemical library, we have discovered two new classes of small molecules that disrupt Wnt pathway responses; whereas one class inhibits the activity of Porcupine, a membrane-bound acyltransferase that is essential to the production of Wnt proteins, the other abrogates destruction of Axin proteins, which are suppressors of Wnt/beta-catenin pathway activity. With these small molecules, we establish a chemical genetic approach for studying Wnt pathway responses and stem cell function in adult tissue. We achieve transient, reversible suppression of Wnt/beta-catenin pathway response in vivo, and we establish a mechanism-based approach to target cancerous cell growth. The signal transduction mechanisms shown here to be chemically tractable additionally contribute to Wnt-independent signal transduction pathways and thus could be broadly exploited for chemical genetics and therapeutic goals.[1]

---

Inhibitors of Wnt production (IWPs) are known antagonists of the Wnt pathway, targeting the membrane-bound O-acyltransferase porcupine (Porcn) and thus preventing a crucial Wnt ligand palmitoylation. Since IWPs show structural similarities to benzimidazole-based CK1 inhibitors, we hypothesized that IWPs could also inhibit CK1 isoforms. Molecular modeling revealed a plausible binding mode of IWP-2 in the ATP binding pocket of CK1δ which was confirmed by X-ray analysis. In vitro kinase assays demonstrated IWPs to be ATP-competitive inhibitors of wtCK1δ. IWPs also strongly inhibited the gatekeeper mutant M82FCK1δ. When profiled in a panel of 320 kinases, IWP-2 specifically inhibited CK1δ. IWP-2 and IWP-4 also inhibited the viability of various cancer cell lines. By a medicinal chemistry approach, we developed improved IWP-derived CK1 inhibitors. Our results suggest that the effects of IWPs are not limited to Porcn, but also might influence CK1δ/ε-related pathways.[2]

---

Phagocytosis is a primary defense program orchestrated by monocytes/macrophages. Unregulated phagocytosis can lead to pathological conditions. In the current study we have demonstrated that Wnt5a stimulates phagocytosis through PI3 kinase-Rac1 and lipid-raft-dependent processes. Wnt5a-mediated augmentation in phagocytosis is suppressed by blocking expression of the putative Wnt5a receptor Frizzled 5. Enhanced phagocytosis of bacteria by Wnt5a-Fz5 signaling increases the secretion of proinflammatory cytokines, but not the bacterial killing rate. Furthermore, a small molecule inhibitor of Wnt production, IWP-2, which reduces secretion of functionally active Wnt5a, not only suppresses both phagocytosis and the secretion of proinflammatory cytokines but also accelerates the bacterial killing rate.[3]

C22H18N4O2S3

466.6

466.059

C, 56.63; H, 3.89; N, 12.01; O, 6.86; S, 20.62

686770-61-6

IWP-2;686770-61-6

2155128

Typically exists as solid at room temperature

1.5±0.1 g/cm3

257 °C(dec.)

1.787

5.25

1

7

5

31

796

0

S1C([H])([H])C([H])([H])C2=C1C(N(C1C([H])=C([H])C([H])=C([H])C=1[H])C(=N2)SC([H])([H])C(N([H])C1=NC2C([H])=C([H])C(C([H])([H])[H])=C([H])C=2S1)=O)=O

WRKPZSMRWPJJDH-UHFFFAOYSA-N

InChI=1S/C22H18N4O2S3/c1-13-7-8-15-17(11-13)31-21(23-15)25-18(27)12-30-22-24-16-9-10-29-19(16)20(28)26(22)14-5-3-2-4-6-14/h2-8,11H,9-10,12H2,1H3,(H,23,25,27)

N -(6-Methyl-2-benzothiazolyl)-2-[(3,4,6,7-tetrahydro-4-oxo-3-phenylthieno[3,2- d ]pyrimidin-2-yl)thio]-acetamide

2934.99.9001

Powder      -20°C    3 years

                     4°C     2 years

In solvent   -80°C    6 months

                  -20°C    1 month

Room temperature (This product is stable at ambient temperature for a few days during ordinary shipping and time spent in Customs)

Note: Listed below are some common formulations that may be used to formulate products with low water solubility (e.g. < 1 mg/mL), you may test these formulations using a minute amount of products to avoid loss of samples.

---

Injection Formulation 1: DMSO : Tween 80： Saline = 10 : 5 : 85 (i.e. 100 μL DMSO stock solution → 50 μL Tween 80 → 850 μL Saline)
*Preparation of saline: Dissolve 0.9 g of sodium chloride in 100 mL ddH ₂ O to obtain a clear solution.
Injection Formulation 2: DMSO : PEG300 ：Tween 80 : Saline = 10 : 40 : 5 : 45 (i.e. 100 μL DMSO → 400 μLPEG300 → 50 μL Tween 80 → 450 μL Saline)
Injection Formulation 3: DMSO : Corn oil = 10 : 90 (i.e. 100 μL DMSO → 900 μL Corn oil)
Example: Take the Injection Formulation 3 (DMSO : Corn oil = 10 : 90) as an example, if 1 mL of 2.5 mg/mL working solution is to be prepared, you can take 100 μL 25 mg/mL DMSO stock solution and add to 900 μL corn oil, mix well to obtain a clear or suspension solution (2.5 mg/mL, ready for use in animals).

View More

Injection Formulation 4: DMSO : 20% SBE-β-CD in saline = 10 : 90 [i.e. 100 μL DMSO → 900 μL (20% SBE-β-CD in saline)]
*Preparation of 20% SBE-β-CD in Saline (4°C，1 week): Dissolve 2 g SBE-β-CD in 10 mL saline to obtain a clear solution.
Injection Formulation 5: 2-Hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin : Saline = 50 : 50 (i.e. 500 μL 2-Hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin → 500 μL Saline)
Injection Formulation 6: DMSO : PEG300 : castor oil : Saline = 5 : 10 : 20 : 65 (i.e. 50 μL DMSO → 100 μLPEG300 → 200 μL castor oil → 650 μL Saline)
Injection Formulation 7: Ethanol : Cremophor : Saline = 10： 10 : 80 (i.e. 100 μL Ethanol → 100 μL Cremophor → 800 μL Saline)
Injection Formulation 8: Dissolve in Cremophor/Ethanol (50 : 50), then diluted by Saline
Injection Formulation 9: EtOH : Corn oil = 10 : 90 (i.e. 100 μL EtOH → 900 μL Corn oil)
Injection Formulation 10: EtOH : PEG300：Tween 80 : Saline = 10 : 40 : 5 : 45 (i.e. 100 μL EtOH → 400 μLPEG300 → 50 μL Tween 80 → 450 μL Saline)

---

Oral Formulation 1: Suspend in 0.5% CMC Na (carboxymethylcellulose sodium)
Oral Formulation 2: Suspend in 0.5% Carboxymethyl cellulose
Example: Take the Oral Formulation 1 (Suspend in 0.5% CMC Na) as an example, if 100 mL of 2.5 mg/mL working solution is to be prepared, you can first prepare 0.5% CMC Na solution by measuring 0.5 g CMC Na and dissolve it in 100 mL ddH2O to obtain a clear solution; then add 250 mg of the product to 100 mL 0.5% CMC Na solution, to make the suspension solution (2.5 mg/mL, ready for use in animals).

View More

Oral Formulation 3: Dissolved in PEG400
Oral Formulation 4: Suspend in 0.2% Carboxymethyl cellulose
Oral Formulation 5: Dissolve in 0.25% Tween 80 and 0.5% Carboxymethyl cellulose
Oral Formulation 6: Mixing with food powders

---

Note: Please be aware that the above formulations are for reference only. InvivoChem strongly recommends customers to read literature methods/protocols carefully before determining which formulation you should use for in vivo studies, as different compounds have different solubility properties and have to be formulated differently.

---

 (Please use freshly prepared in vivo formulations for optimal results.)