Size | Price | |
---|---|---|
500mg | ||
1g | ||
Other Sizes |
L-Eflornithine, the L-enantiomer of Eflornithine (DFMO; MDL71782; RMI71782; α-difluoromethylornithine) which is a potent, specific, irreversible inhibitor of the enzyme ornithine decarboxylase. Eflornithine is used as a medication for the treatment of African trypanosomiasis and excessive facial hair growth in women. Facial hirsutism is a cosmetic concern for women and can lead to significant anxiety and lack of self-esteem. Eflornithine cream is indicated for the treatment of facial hirsutism. However, limited success rate and overall patient's satisfaction, even with a long-term and high-frequency application, leave room for improvement.
Targets |
Trypanosoma; Ornithine decarboxylase
Ornithine decarboxylase
|
---|---|
ln Vitro |
Eflornithine (D/L-DFMO) is an inhibitor of the first enzyme involved in the manufacture of eukaryotic polyamines, ODC. ODC is irreversibly rendered inactive by eflornithine (DFMO) in both enantiomers. ODC activity is inhibited by two eflornithine enantiomers, L-eflornithine and D-eflornithine, in a concentration- and time-dependent manner. The enzyme-inhibitor complexes formed by D-eflornithine, L-eflornithine, and eflornithine have inhibitor dissociation constants (KD) values of 28.3±3.4, 1.3±0.3, and 2.2±, respectively. 0.4 micrograms. For D-eflornithine, L-eflornithine, and Eflornithine, the inhibitor deactivation constants (Kinact) for the irreversible process were 0.25±0.03, 0.15±0.03, and 0.15±0.03 min-1, respectively. L-or D-eflornithine treatment of human colon tumor-derived HCT116 cells lowers cellular polyamine levels in a concentration-dependent manner [1]. The L-enantiomer has a 20-fold greater affinity for the target enzyme ornithine decarboxylase [2]. Enantiomers have varied potencies in vitro. Additionally, it seems that L-eflornithine is more efficient against B. gambiae parasites grown in culture [2].
|
ln Vivo |
Compared to D-eflornithine, the more potent L-eflornithine is found in significantly lower amounts in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). L-eflornithine's typical plasma concentration is 52% of the D-enantiomer's concentration. L-eflornithine and D-eflornithine had typical oral clearance rates of 17.4 L/h and 8.23 L/h, respectively [2].
|
Enzyme Assay |
Racemic difluoromethylornithine (D/L-DFMO) is an inhibitor of ODC (ornithine decarboxylase), the first enzyme in eukaryotic polyamine biosynthesis. D/L-DFMO is an effective anti-parasitic agent and inhibitor of mammalian cell growth and development. Purified human ODC-catalysed ornithine decarboxylation is highly stereospecific. However, both DFMO enantiomers suppressed ODC activity in a time- and concentration-dependent manner. ODC activity failed to recover after treatment with either L- or D-DFMO and dialysis to remove free inhibitor. The inhibitor dissociation constant (K(D)) values for the formation of enzyme-inhibitor complexes were 28.3+/-3.4, 1.3+/-0.3 and 2.2+/-0.4 microM respectively for D-, L- and D/L-DFMO. The differences in these K(D) values were statistically significant ( P <0.05). The inhibitor inactivation constants (K(inact)) for the irreversible step were 0.25+/-0.03, 0.15+/-0.03 and 0.15+/-0.03 min(-1) respectively for D-, L- and D/L-DFMO. These latter values were not statistically significantly different ( P >0.1). D-DFMO was a more potent inhibitor (IC50 approximately 7.5 microM) when compared with D-ornithine (IC50 approximately 1.5 mM) of ODC-catalysed L-ornithine decarboxylation. Treatment of human colon tumour-derived HCT116 cells with either L- or D-DFMO decreased the cellular polyamine contents in a concentration-dependent manner. These results show that both enantiomers of DFMO irreversibly inactivate ODC and suggest that this inactivation occurs by a common mechanism. Both enantiomers form enzyme-inhibitor complexes with ODC, but the probability of formation of these complexes is 20 times greater for L-DFMO when compared with D-DFMO. The rate of the irreversible reaction in ODC inactivation is similar for the L- and D-enantiomer. This unexpected similarity between DFMO enantiomers, in contrast with the high degree of stereospecificity of the substrate ornithine, appears to be due to the alpha-substituent of the inhibitor. The D-enantiomer may have advantages, such as decreased normal tissue toxicity, over L- or D/L-DFMO in some clinical applications.[1]
|
Animal Protocol |
This study aimed to characterize the stereoselective pharmacokinetics of oral eflornithine in 25 patients with late-stage Trypanosoma brucei gambiense sleeping sickness. A secondary aim was to determine the concentrations of L- and D-eflornithine required in plasma or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) for an efficient eradication of the T. brucei gambiense parasites. Patients were randomly allocated to receive either 100 (group I, n=12) or 125 (group II, n=13) mg/kg of body weight of drug every 6 h for 14 days. The concentrations of L- and D-eflornithine in the plasma and CSF samples were measured using a stereospecific liquid chromatographic method. Nonlinear mixed-effects modeling was used to characterize the plasma pharmacokinetics. The plasma concentrations of L-eflornithine were on average 52% (95% confidence interval [CI], 51, 54%; n=321) of the D-enantiomer concentrations. The typical oral clearances of L- and D-eflornithine were 17.4 (95% CI, 15.5, 19.3) and 8.23 (95% CI, 7.36, 9.10) liters/h, respectively. These differences were likely due to stereoselective intestinal absorption. The distributions of eflornithine enantiomers to the CSF were not stereoselective. A correlation was found between the probability of cure and plasma drug exposure, although it was not more pronounced for the L-enantiomer than for that of total eflornithine. This study may explain why oral treatment for late-stage human African trypanosomiasis (HAT) patients with racemic eflornithine has previously failed; the more potent L-enantiomer is present at much lower concentrations in both plasma and CSF than those of the D-enantiomer. Eflornithine stereoselective pharmacokinetics needs to be considered if an oral dosage regimen is to be explored further.[2]
|
ADME/Pharmacokinetics |
Absorption, Distribution and Excretion
Following oral administrations of eflornithine, peak plasma concentrations of eflornithine (Cmax) were achieved (Tmax) 3.5 hours post-dosing. The Cmax and AUC (area under the concentration-time curve) of eflornithine were not affected by food (high fat and high calories). Administration of crushed tablets in a standard pudding admixture had no effect on eflornithine exposure (Cmax and AUC6h). The mean percutaneous absorption of eflornithine in women with unwanted facial hair, from a 13.9% w/w cream formulation, is < 1% of the radioactive dose, following either single or multiple doses under conditions of clinical use, that included shaving within 2 hours before radiolabeled dose application in addition to other forms of cutting or plucking and tweezing to remove facial hair. Steady state was reached within four days of twice-daily application. Following twice-daily application of 0.5 g of the cream (total dose 1.0 g/day; 139 mg as anhydrous eflornithine hydrochloride), under conditions of clinical use in women with unwanted facial hair (n=10), the steady-state Cmax, Ctrough and AUC12hr were approximately 10 ng/mL, 5 ng/mL, and 92 ng hr/mL, respectively, expressed in terms of the anhydrous free base of eflornithine hydrochloride. At steady state, the dose-normalized peak concentrations (Cmax) and the extent of daily systemic exposure (AUC) of eflornithine following twice-daily application of 0.5 g of the cream (total dose 1.0 g/day) is estimated to be approximately 100- and 60-fold lower, respectively, when compared to 370 mg/day once-daily oral doses. This compound is not known to be metabolized and is primarily excreted unchanged in the urine. Eflornithine volume of distribution (Vz/F) is 24.3 L. The clearance (CL/F) of eflornithine is 5.3 L/h. The mean percutaneous absorption of eflornithine in women with unwanted facial hair, from a 13.9% w/w cream formulation, is < 1% of the radioactive dose, following either single or multiple doses under conditions of clinical use, that included shaving within 2 hr before radiolabeled dose application in addition to other forms of cutting or plucking and tweezing to remove facial hair. Following twice daily application of 0.5 g of the cream (total dose 1.0 g/day; 139 mg as anhydrous eflornithine hydrochloride), under conditions of clinical use in women with unwanted facial hair (n=10), the steady-state Cmax, Ctrough and AUC12hr were approximately 10 ng/mL, 5 ng/mL, and 92 nghr/mL, respectively, expressed in terms of the anhydrous free base of eflornithine hydrochloride. At steady state, the dose-normalized peak concentrations (Cmax) and the extent of daily systemic exposure (AUC) of eflornithine following twice-daily application of 0.5 g of the cream (total dose 1.0 g/day) is estimated to be approximately 100- and 60-fold lower, respectively, when compared to 370 mg/day once-daily oral doses. Eflornithine is not metabolized and is excreted unchanged in urine. For more Absorption, Distribution and Excretion (Complete) data for Eflornithine (8 total), please visit the HSDB record page. Metabolism / Metabolites This compound is not known to be metabolized and is primarily excreted unchanged in the urine. Biological Half-Life The terminal plasma elimination half-life of eflornithine was 3.5 hours, and the apparent steady-state plasma half-life of eflornithine was approximately 8 hours. The apparent steady-state plasma t1/2 of eflornithine was approximately 8 hours. |
Toxicity/Toxicokinetics |
Effects During Pregnancy and Lactation
◉ Summary of Use during Lactation Maternal intravenous eflornithine 400 mg/kg daily for 7 days did not cause any adverse serious effects in breastfed infants. After topical application, eflornithine is poorly absorbed so it is not likely to reach the bloodstream of the infant or cause any adverse effects in breastfed infants. ◉ Effects in Breastfed Infants A cohort of 33 infants who were breastfed (extent not stated) by hospitalized mothers taking nifurtimox was followed in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Thirty mothers took a full course of 30 doses of oral nifurtimox 15 mg/kg daily and all received 14 doses of intravenous eflornithine 400 mg/kg daily for 7 days for human African trypanosomiasis. (sleeping sickness). Nursing mothers also took a median of 4 other concomitant medications, including amoxicillin, ciprofloxacin, metronidazole, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, aspirin, and diclofenac (1 patient each); hydrocortisone, promethazine and quinine (2 patients each); levamisole (6 patients); sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (8 patients); dipyrone (13 patients); acetaminophen (16 patients); and mebendazole (17 patients). No serious adverse events were reported in any of the breastfed infants. ◉ Effects on Lactation and Breastmilk Relevant published information was not found as of the revision date. Protein Binding Eflornithine does not specifically bind to human plasma proteins. |
References |
[1]. Qu N, et al. Inhibition of human ornithine decarboxylase activity by enantiomers of difluoromethylornithine. Biochem J. 2003 Oct 15;375(Pt 2):465-70.
[2]. Jansson-Löfmark R, et al. Enantiospecific reassessment of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oral eflornithine against late-stage Trypanosoma brucei gambiense sleeping sickness. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015 Feb;59(2):1299-307. |
Additional Infomation |
See also: Eflornithine (annotation moved to).
|
Molecular Formula |
C6H12F2N2O2
|
---|---|
Molecular Weight |
182.16848
|
Exact Mass |
182.086
|
Elemental Analysis |
C, 39.56; H, 6.64; F, 20.86; N, 15.38; O, 17.56
|
CAS # |
66640-93-5
|
Related CAS # |
Eflornithine;70052-12-9;Eflornithine hydrochloride hydrate;96020-91-6;L-Eflornithine monohydrochloride;69955-42-6;Eflornithine hydrochloride;68278-23-9
|
PubChem CID |
6992039
|
Appearance |
solid powder
|
Density |
1.3±0.1 g/cm3
|
Boiling Point |
347.0±42.0 °C at 760 mmHg
|
Flash Point |
163.7±27.9 °C
|
Vapour Pressure |
0.0±1.6 mmHg at 25°C
|
Index of Refraction |
1.462
|
LogP |
0.29
|
Hydrogen Bond Donor Count |
3
|
Hydrogen Bond Acceptor Count |
6
|
Rotatable Bond Count |
5
|
Heavy Atom Count |
12
|
Complexity |
166
|
Defined Atom Stereocenter Count |
1
|
SMILES |
C(C[C@@](C(F)F)(C(=O)O)N)CN
|
InChi Key |
VLCYCQAOQCDTCN-ZCFIWIBFSA-N
|
InChi Code |
InChI=1S/C6H12F2N2O2/c7-4(8)6(10,5(11)12)2-1-3-9/h4H,1-3,9-10H2,(H,11,12)/t6-/m1/s1
|
Chemical Name |
(S)-2,5-diamino-2-(difluoromethyl)pentanoic acid
|
Synonyms |
L-Eflornithine; L-alpha-Difluoromethylornithine; L-EFLORNITHINE; 66640-93-5; (S)-2,5-diamino-2-(difluoromethyl)pentanoic acid; EFLORNITHINE, (S)-; DTXSID00880061; (2S)-2,5-diamino-2-(difluoromethyl)pentanoic acid; 66640-93-5 (L-isomer); (-)-2-Difluoromethylornithine; (-)-2-Difluoromethylornithine
|
HS Tariff Code |
2934.99.9001
|
Storage |
Powder -20°C 3 years 4°C 2 years In solvent -80°C 6 months -20°C 1 month |
Shipping Condition |
Room temperature (This product is stable at ambient temperature for a few days during ordinary shipping and time spent in Customs)
|
Solubility (In Vitro) |
Typically soluble in DMSO (e.g. 10 mM)
|
---|---|
Solubility (In Vivo) |
Note: Listed below are some common formulations that may be used to formulate products with low water solubility (e.g. < 1 mg/mL), you may test these formulations using a minute amount of products to avoid loss of samples.
Injection Formulations
Injection Formulation 1: DMSO : Tween 80: Saline = 10 : 5 : 85 (i.e. 100 μL DMSO stock solution → 50 μL Tween 80 → 850 μL Saline)(e.g. IP/IV/IM/SC) *Preparation of saline: Dissolve 0.9 g of sodium chloride in 100 mL ddH ₂ O to obtain a clear solution. Injection Formulation 2: DMSO : PEG300 :Tween 80 : Saline = 10 : 40 : 5 : 45 (i.e. 100 μL DMSO → 400 μLPEG300 → 50 μL Tween 80 → 450 μL Saline) Injection Formulation 3: DMSO : Corn oil = 10 : 90 (i.e. 100 μL DMSO → 900 μL Corn oil) Example: Take the Injection Formulation 3 (DMSO : Corn oil = 10 : 90) as an example, if 1 mL of 2.5 mg/mL working solution is to be prepared, you can take 100 μL 25 mg/mL DMSO stock solution and add to 900 μL corn oil, mix well to obtain a clear or suspension solution (2.5 mg/mL, ready for use in animals). View More
Injection Formulation 4: DMSO : 20% SBE-β-CD in saline = 10 : 90 [i.e. 100 μL DMSO → 900 μL (20% SBE-β-CD in saline)] Oral Formulations
Oral Formulation 1: Suspend in 0.5% CMC Na (carboxymethylcellulose sodium) Oral Formulation 2: Suspend in 0.5% Carboxymethyl cellulose Example: Take the Oral Formulation 1 (Suspend in 0.5% CMC Na) as an example, if 100 mL of 2.5 mg/mL working solution is to be prepared, you can first prepare 0.5% CMC Na solution by measuring 0.5 g CMC Na and dissolve it in 100 mL ddH2O to obtain a clear solution; then add 250 mg of the product to 100 mL 0.5% CMC Na solution, to make the suspension solution (2.5 mg/mL, ready for use in animals). View More
Oral Formulation 3: Dissolved in PEG400  (Please use freshly prepared in vivo formulations for optimal results.) |
Preparing Stock Solutions | 1 mg | 5 mg | 10 mg | |
1 mM | 5.4894 mL | 27.4469 mL | 54.8938 mL | |
5 mM | 1.0979 mL | 5.4894 mL | 10.9788 mL | |
10 mM | 0.5489 mL | 2.7447 mL | 5.4894 mL |
*Note: Please select an appropriate solvent for the preparation of stock solution based on your experiment needs. For most products, DMSO can be used for preparing stock solutions (e.g. 5 mM, 10 mM, or 20 mM concentration); some products with high aqueous solubility may be dissolved in water directly. Solubility information is available at the above Solubility Data section. Once the stock solution is prepared, aliquot it to routine usage volumes and store at -20°C or -80°C. Avoid repeated freeze and thaw cycles.
Calculation results
Working concentration: mg/mL;
Method for preparing DMSO stock solution: mg drug pre-dissolved in μL DMSO (stock solution concentration mg/mL). Please contact us first if the concentration exceeds the DMSO solubility of the batch of drug.
Method for preparing in vivo formulation::Take μL DMSO stock solution, next add μL PEG300, mix and clarify, next addμL Tween 80, mix and clarify, next add μL ddH2O,mix and clarify.
(1) Please be sure that the solution is clear before the addition of next solvent. Dissolution methods like vortex, ultrasound or warming and heat may be used to aid dissolving.
(2) Be sure to add the solvent(s) in order.