T-type calcium channel （IC50 = 2.7 μM); (L-type calcium channel（IC50 = 18.6 μM)

T-type and L-type currents are reversibly inhibited by mibefradil dihydrochloride, with IC50 values of 2.7 and 18.6 μM, respectively. While T-type current suppression is independent of voltage, L-type current suppression is reliant on voltage. The T-shaped current is already blocked by Ro 40-5967 at a holding potential of -100 mV [1]. Mibefradil significantly depolarized the membrane potential (from -83±1 mV to -71±5 mV) at higher concentrations (20 μM), decreased the repolarization rate (44±16%), and lowered the amplitude of the excitatory junction potential (37±10%). The membrane potential exhibits a notable depolarization and repolarization slowdown at higher concentrations of Mibefradil dihydrochloride (20 μM). The observed effects of Mibefradil align with the evidence of K+ channel blockage in human myoblasts and other cell types [2].

Following a 4-week treatment period, hearing thresholds in C57BL/6J mice aged 24 to 26 weeks varied. The 24 kHz hearing threshold of both the benidipine- and Mibefradil dihydrochloride-treated groups was considerably (P<0.05) lower than that of the saline-treated group[3]. The expression of CaV3.2 in the DRG and spinal cord of rats in the Mibefradil dihydrochloride or NSC 64013 group was considerably lower than in the normal saline group [4]. Seven days after SNL, CaV3.2 protein levels were upregulated in ipsi-lateral L5/6 spinal cord and dorsal root ganglia (DRG) in immunofluorescence and Western blotting studies. Compared with the saline-treated group, rats receiving mibefradil or ethosuximide showed significant lower CaV3.2 expression in the spinal cord and DRG. No obvious histopathologic change in hematoxylin-eosin and toluidine blue staining were observed in all tested groups. Conclusion: In this study, we demonstrate that SNL-induced CaV3.2 upregulation in the spinal cord and DRG was attenuated by intrathecal infusion of mibefradil or ethosuximide. No obvious neurotoxicity effects were observed in all the tested groups. Our data suggest that continuous intrathecal infusion of TCC blockers may be considered as a promising alternative for the treatment of nerve injury-induced pain.[4]

The effects of Mibefradil/Ro 40-5967, a nondihydropyridine Ca++ channel blocker, on low-voltage activated (T-type) and high-voltage activated (L-type) Ca++ channels were compared. L-type barium currents were measured in Chinese hamster ovary cells stably transfected with the alpha 1 subunit of the class Cb Ca++ channel. T-type barium currents were investigated in human medullary thyroid carcinoma cells. The Ba++ currents of human medullary thyroid carcinoma cells were transient, activated at a threshold potential of -50 mV with the maximum at -14 +/- 3.2 mV and blocked by micromolar Ni++. The T- and L-type current inactivated with time constants of 33.4 +/- 4.1 and 416 +/- 26 msec at maximum barium currents, respectively. Ro 40-5967 inhibited reversibly the T- and L-type currents with IC50 values of 2.7 and 18.6 microM, respectively. The inhibition of the L-type current was voltage-dependent, whereas that of the T-type current was not. Ro 40-5967 blocked T-type current already at a holding potential of -100 mV. The different types of block, i.e., voltage-dependent vs. tonic block, may contribute to the pharmacological profile of Ro 40-5967 in intact animals.[1]

Smooth muscle cells in whole mouse deferens were loaded with the Ca(2+) indicator Oregon Green 488 BAPTA-1 AM and viewed with a confocal microscope. Ryanodine (10 microM) decreased the amplitude of NCTs by 45 +/- 6 %. Cyclopiazonic acid slowed the recovery of NCTs (from a time course of 200 +/- 10 ms to 800 +/- 100 ms). Caffeine (3 mM) induced spontaneous focal smooth muscle Ca(2+) transients (sparks). Neither of the T-type Ca(2+) channel blockers NiCl2 (50 microM) or mibefradil dihydrochloride (10 microM) affected the amplitude of excitatory junction potentials (2 +/- 5 % and -3 +/- 10 %) or NCTs (-20 +/- 36 % and 3 +/- 13 %). In about 20 % of cells, NCTs were associated with a local, subcellular twitch that remained in the presence of the alpha1-adrenoceptor antagonist prazosin (100 nM), showing that NCTs can initiate local contractions. Slow (5.8 +/- 0.4 microm s(-1)), spontaneous smooth muscle Ca(2+) waves were occasionally observed. Thus, Ca(2+) stores initially amplify and then sequester the Ca(2+) that enters through P2X receptors and there is no amplification by local voltage-gated Ca(2+) channels.[2]

Male Sprague-Dawley rats (200-250 g) were used for right L5/6 SNL to induce neuropathic pain. Intrathecal infusion of saline or TCC blockers [mibefradil (0.7 μg/h) or ethosuximide (60 μg/h)] was started after surgery for 7 days. Fluorescent immunohistochemistry and Western blotting were used to determine the expression pattern and protein level of CaV3.2. Hematoxylin-eosin and toluidine blue staining were used to evaluate the neurotoxicity of tested agents.[4]

---

The aim of the present study was to investigate the protective effect of T-type calcium channel blockers against presbycusis, using a C57BL/6J mice model. The expression of three T-type calcium channel receptor subunits in the cochlea of 6-8-week-old C57BL/6J mice was evaluated using reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction. The results confirmed that the three subunits were expressed in the cochlea. In addition, the capacity of T-type calcium channel blockers to protect the cochlear hair cells of 24-26-week-old C57BL/6J mice was investigated in mice treated with mibefradil, benidipine or saline for 4 weeks. Differences in hearing threshold were detected using auditory brainstem recording (ABR), while differences in amplitudes were measured using a distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) test. The ABR test results showed that the hearing threshold significantly decreased at 24 kHz in the mibefradil-treated and benidipine-treated groups compared with the saline-treated group. The DPOAE amplitudes in the mibefradil-treated group were increased compared with those in the saline-treated group at the F2 frequencies of 11.3 and 13.4 kHz. Furthermore, the DPOAE amplitudes in the benidipine-treated group were increased compared with those in the saline-treated group at an F2 frequency of 13.4 kHz. The loss of outer hair cells (OHCs) was not evident in the mibefradil-treated group; however, the stereocilia of the inner hair cells (IHCs) were disorganised and sparse. In summary, these results indicate that the administration of a T-type calcium channel blocker for four consecutive weeks may improve the hearing at 24 kHz of 24-26-week-old C57BL/6J mice. The function and morphology of the OHCs of the C57BL/6J mice were significantly altered by the administration of a T-type calcium channel blocker; however, the IHCs were unaffected.[3]

Absorption
Bioavailability after a single dose is 70%. After multiple dosing, the proportion of mibefradil undergoing first-pass metabolism is reduced, resulting in a steady state bioavailability of approximately 90%. Food does not affect the rate or extent of absorption of mibefradil.

---

Metabolism / Metabolites
The two metabolic pathways that mibefradil undergoes are esterase-catalyzed hydrolysis of the ester side chain (producing an alcohol metabolite) and cytochrome P450 3A4-catalyzed oxidation (that becomes less important during chronic dosing). The pharmacologic effect of the metabolite is approximately 10% of that of the parent mibefradil.

---

Biological Half-Life
17 to 25 hours at steady state.

Protein Binding: ≥ 99%, primarily to alpha 1-acid glycoprotein.

---

rat LD50 oral >800 mg/kg Cardiovascular Drug Reviews., 9(4), 1991
rat LD50 intravenous 23 mg/kg Cardiovascular Drug Reviews., 9(4), 1991
mouse LD50 oral >800 mg/kg Cardiovascular Drug Reviews., 9(4), 1991
mouse LD50 intravenous 35 mg/kg Cardiovascular Drug Reviews., 9(4), 1991

[1]. The Ca(++)-channel blocker Ro 40-5967 blocks differently T-type and L-type Ca++ channels. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1994 Dec;271(3):1483-8.

[2]. The sources and sequestration of Ca(2+) contributing to neuroeffector Ca(2+) transients in the mouse vas deferens. J Physiol. 2003 Dec 1;553(Pt 2):627-35.

[3]. Protection of the cochlear hair cells in adult C57BL/6J mice by T-type calcium channel blockers. Exp Ther Med. 2016 Mar;11(3):1039-1044.

[4]. Chronic intrathecal infusion of T-type calcium channel blockers attenuates CaV3.2 upregulation in nerve-ligated rats. Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan. 2016 Oct 17. pii: S1875-4597(16)30071-6.

A benzimidazoyl-substituted tetraline that selectively binds and inhibits CALCIUM CHANNELS, T-TYPE.

C29H40CL2FN3O3

568.5506

567.243

C, 61.26; H, 7.09; Cl, 12.47; F, 3.34; N, 7.39; O, 8.44

116666-63-8

Mibefradil;116644-53-2;Mibefradil dihydrochloride hydrate;1049728-52-0

60662

White to yellow solid powder

647.6ºC at 760mmHg

345.5ºC

1.17E-16mmHg at 25°C

6.874

3

6

12

38

709

2

CC(C)[C@H]1C2=C(CC[C@@]1(CCN(C)CCCC3=NC4=CC=CC=C4N3)OC(=O)COC)C=C(C=C2)F.Cl.Cl

MTJLQTFHJIHXIX-GDUXWEAWSA-N

InChI=1S/C29H38FN3O3.2ClH/c1-20(2)28-23-12-11-22(30)18-21(23)13-14-29(28,36-27(34)19-35-4)15-17-33(3)16-7-10-26-31-24-8-5-6-9-25(24)32-26;;/h5-6,8-9,11-12,18,20,28H,7,10,13-17,19H2,1-4H3,(H,31,32);2*1H/t28-,29-;;/m0../s1

[(1S,2S)-2-[2-[3-(1H-benzimidazol-2-yl)propyl-methylamino]ethyl]-6-fluoro-1-propan-2-yl-3,4-dihydro-1H-naphthalen-2-yl] 2-methoxyacetate;dihydrochloride

Mibefradil dihydrochloride; 116666-63-8; Posicor; Mibefradil HCl; Mibefradil dihydrochloride [USAN]; Mibefradil (dihydrochloride); Mibefradil hydrochloride; Ro 40-5967;

2934.99.9001

Powder      -20°C    3 years

                     4°C     2 years

In solvent   -80°C    6 months

                  -20°C    1 month

Note: Please store this product in a sealed and protected environment (e.g. under nitrogen), avoid exposure to moisture.

Room temperature (This product is stable at ambient temperature for a few days during ordinary shipping and time spent in Customs)

H2O : ~150 mg/mL (~263.83 mM)

Note: Listed below are some common formulations that may be used to formulate products with low water solubility (e.g. < 1 mg/mL), you may test these formulations using a minute amount of products to avoid loss of samples.

---

Injection Formulation 1: DMSO : Tween 80： Saline = 10 : 5 : 85 (i.e. 100 μL DMSO stock solution → 50 μL Tween 80 → 850 μL Saline)
*Preparation of saline: Dissolve 0.9 g of sodium chloride in 100 mL ddH ₂ O to obtain a clear solution.
Injection Formulation 2: DMSO : PEG300 ：Tween 80 : Saline = 10 : 40 : 5 : 45 (i.e. 100 μL DMSO → 400 μLPEG300 → 50 μL Tween 80 → 450 μL Saline)
Injection Formulation 3: DMSO : Corn oil = 10 : 90 (i.e. 100 μL DMSO → 900 μL Corn oil)
Example: Take the Injection Formulation 3 (DMSO : Corn oil = 10 : 90) as an example, if 1 mL of 2.5 mg/mL working solution is to be prepared, you can take 100 μL 25 mg/mL DMSO stock solution and add to 900 μL corn oil, mix well to obtain a clear or suspension solution (2.5 mg/mL, ready for use in animals).

View More

Injection Formulation 4: DMSO : 20% SBE-β-CD in saline = 10 : 90 [i.e. 100 μL DMSO → 900 μL (20% SBE-β-CD in saline)]
*Preparation of 20% SBE-β-CD in Saline (4°C，1 week): Dissolve 2 g SBE-β-CD in 10 mL saline to obtain a clear solution.
Injection Formulation 5: 2-Hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin : Saline = 50 : 50 (i.e. 500 μL 2-Hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin → 500 μL Saline)
Injection Formulation 6: DMSO : PEG300 : castor oil : Saline = 5 : 10 : 20 : 65 (i.e. 50 μL DMSO → 100 μLPEG300 → 200 μL castor oil → 650 μL Saline)
Injection Formulation 7: Ethanol : Cremophor : Saline = 10： 10 : 80 (i.e. 100 μL Ethanol → 100 μL Cremophor → 800 μL Saline)
Injection Formulation 8: Dissolve in Cremophor/Ethanol (50 : 50), then diluted by Saline
Injection Formulation 9: EtOH : Corn oil = 10 : 90 (i.e. 100 μL EtOH → 900 μL Corn oil)
Injection Formulation 10: EtOH : PEG300：Tween 80 : Saline = 10 : 40 : 5 : 45 (i.e. 100 μL EtOH → 400 μLPEG300 → 50 μL Tween 80 → 450 μL Saline)

---

Oral Formulation 1: Suspend in 0.5% CMC Na (carboxymethylcellulose sodium)
Oral Formulation 2: Suspend in 0.5% Carboxymethyl cellulose
Example: Take the Oral Formulation 1 (Suspend in 0.5% CMC Na) as an example, if 100 mL of 2.5 mg/mL working solution is to be prepared, you can first prepare 0.5% CMC Na solution by measuring 0.5 g CMC Na and dissolve it in 100 mL ddH2O to obtain a clear solution; then add 250 mg of the product to 100 mL 0.5% CMC Na solution, to make the suspension solution (2.5 mg/mL, ready for use in animals).

View More

Oral Formulation 3: Dissolved in PEG400
Oral Formulation 4: Suspend in 0.2% Carboxymethyl cellulose
Oral Formulation 5: Dissolve in 0.25% Tween 80 and 0.5% Carboxymethyl cellulose
Oral Formulation 6: Mixing with food powders

---

Note: Please be aware that the above formulations are for reference only. InvivoChem strongly recommends customers to read literature methods/protocols carefully before determining which formulation you should use for in vivo studies, as different compounds have different solubility properties and have to be formulated differently.

---

 (Please use freshly prepared in vivo formulations for optimal results.)