BRaf(V600E)

Among the compounds that exhibited more than 100-fold EPII was a molecule (PLX7683) that contained an N-ethylmethyl-sulfamide moiety in lieu of the propyl-sulfonamide tail of vemurafenib. [1]

Biochemical assays and kinome selectivity profiling. [1]
The in vitro RAF kinase activities were determined by measuring phosphorylation of a biotinylated substrate peptide as described previously25. PLX7904 was also tested against a panel of 287 kinases at concentrations of 1 μM in duplicate. Kinases inhibited by over 50% were followed up by IC50 determination. The 287 kinases represent all major branches of the kinome phylogenetic tree. The inhibition screen of 287 kinases was performed under contract as complementary panels at CRO companies.

---

Phospho-ERK AlphaScreen assay. [1]
To determine the effects of compound treatment on phosphorylation of ERK1/2, cells were plated in a 96-well plate and treated with an eight-point titration of compound for 1 h at 37 °C before lysis. To detect pERK, cell lysates were incubated with streptavidin-coated AlphaScreen donor beads, anti-mouse IgG AlphaScreen acceptor beads, a biotinylated anti-ERK1/2 rabbit antibody, and a mouse antibody that recognized ERK1/2 only when it was phosphorylated on Thr202 and Tyr204. The biotinylated ERK1/2 antibody bound both to the streptavidin-coated AlphaScreen donor beads and to ERK1/2 (regardless of its phosphorylation state), and the phospho-ERK1/2 antibody bound to the acceptor beads and to ERK1/2 that was phosphorylated at Thr202/Tyr204. An increase in ERK1/2 phosphorylation at Thr202/Tyr204 brought the donor and acceptor AlphaScreen beads into close proximity, generating a signal that could be quantified on an EnVision reader. Inhibition of ERK phosphorylation resulted in a loss of signal compared with DMSO controls.

For MTT assays, 2×103 cells are seeded in triplicate in 96 wells of their regular culture medium (which contains PLX4720 for PRT lines). The medium is replaced the following day with the specified RAF inhibitor after cells have been washed twice with PBS. The medium is changed after 48 hours, and then after an additional 48 hours, 10 μL of the 5 mg/mL MTT reagent is added to the wells and incubated for three hours. Then, formazan crystals are solubilized over night with a 1:10 dilution of 0.1 M glycine (pH 10.5) in DMSO. Then, using a Multiskan® Spectrum spectrophotometer, wells are evaluated at 450 nM. The results shown are a composite of three separate experiments and have been normalized to DMSO conditions. The error bars that are displayed are an accurate representation of the standard error of the mean.

---

Anchorage-independent growth assay. [1]
Twenty-five thousand B9 cells were plated in each well of a six-well plate with a bottom layer of 1% and a top layer of 0.4% low melting agar containing RPMI1640 medium with 10% FBS. For the RAF inhibitor study, B9 cells grown in soft agar were treated with vemurafenib, PLX4720 or PLX7904 at the indicated concentrations, or DMSO at 0.2% final concentration for 3 weeks. For the EGFR ligand study, B9 cells grown in soft agar were treated with AREG, TGF-α , or HB-EGF at the indicated concentrations for 3 weeks. For the vemurafinib and erlotinib combination study, B9 cells grown in soft agar were treated with vemurafenib, erlotinib, or a combination of the two compounds at the indicated concentrations, or DMSO for 3 weeks. Anchorage-independent colonies ≥ 100 μm were scored using AxioVision Rel 4.8 software. [1]

---

Microarray gene expression analysis. [1]
B9 cells were plated in 1 µM vemurafenib, 1 µM PLX7904 or 0.2% DMSO vehicle control and incubated for 17 h. Cells were harvested, total RNA was isolated, and gene expression was measured using Affymetrix Mouse420_2 chips following the manufacturer’s instructions. Vemurafenib response genes were identified by requiring the ratio between the treated and vehicle control samples be more than 1.9 (upregulated) or less than 0.54 (downregulated). [1]

Bovine insulin is added to DMEM with 10% FBS, 1% penicillin/streptomycin, and 1% bovine insulin during the culture of COLO205 tumor cells at 37°C. Female Balb/C nude mice, 6–8 weeks old, weighing about 18–22 g, are subcutaneously injected at the right flank with COLO205 tumor cells (5×106) in 0.1 mL of PBS mixed with matrigel (50:50) to test the development of tumors. Eight mice are randomly assigned to each treatment group so that the mean weight and tumor size are balanced when the mean tumor size reaches about 100 mm3. DMEM 10% FBS 1% penicillin/streptomycin is used to grow B9 cells. The cells are trypsinized, washed three times with 20 mL RPMI, and then re-suspended, counted, and volume-adjusted to a final concentration of 5×107 cells per milliliter before final centrifugation. In 6- to 7-week-old female nude Balb/c mice, 5×106 cells are subcutaneously injected to begin B9 xenografts. When the average tumor size reaches 50–70 mm3, compound dosing begins. To maintain a balance between the average tumor size and body weight, animals are evenly distributed among treatment groups (n=10). Animals are given vehicle, vemurafenib 50 mg per kg, or PLX7904 50 mg per kg twice daily for days 1 through 14 and once daily for days 15 through 28. In weeks three and four, 2 g of 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA) in 200 l of acetone is applied to the skin of every mouse.

---

COLO205 tumour cells were cultured in DMEM 10% FBS 1% penicillin/streptomycin supplemented with bovine insulin, at 37 °C. Balb/C nude mice, female, 6–8 weeks old, weighing approximately 18–22 g, were inoculated subcutaneously at the right flank with COLO205 tumour cells (5 × 106) in 0.1 ml of PBS mixed with matrigel (50:50) for tumour development. The treatment was started when mean tumour size reached approximately 100 mm3, with eight mice in each treatment group randomized to balance the average weight and tumour size. B9 cells were expanded in DMEM 10% FBS 1% penicillin/streptomycin. Upon trypsinization the cells were washed three times with 20 ml RPMI, and after the final centrifugation were re-suspended, counted, and adjusted by volume to a final concentration of 5 × 107 cells per millilitre. B9 xenografts were started by injection of 5 × 106 cells subcutaneously in 6- to 7-week-old female nude Balb/c mice. Compound dosing started when the average size of tumours reached 50–70 mm3. Animals were equally distributed over treatment groups (n = 10) to balance the average tumour size and body weight. Animals were dosed orally for days 1–14 twice daily and days 15–28 once daily with vehicle, vemurafenib 50 mg per kg, or PLX7904 50 mg per kg. 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA) was put on the skin of all mice twice a week during weeks 3 and 4 at a dose of 2 µg in 200 µl acetone. [1]

[1]. RAF inhibitors that evade paradoxical MAPK pathway activation. Nature. 2015 Oct 22;526(7574):583-586.

Oncogenic activation of BRAF fuels cancer growth by constitutively promoting RAS-independent mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway signalling. Accordingly, RAF inhibitors have brought substantially improved personalized treatment of metastatic melanoma. However, these targeted agents have also revealed an unexpected consequence: stimulated growth of certain cancers. Structurally diverse ATP-competitive RAF inhibitors can either inhibit or paradoxically activate the MAPK pathway, depending whether activation is by BRAF mutation or by an upstream event, such as RAS mutation or receptor tyrosine kinase activation. Here we have identified next-generation RAF inhibitors (dubbed 'paradox breakers') that suppress mutant BRAF cells without activating the MAPK pathway in cells bearing upstream activation. In cells that express the same HRAS mutation prevalent in squamous tumours from patients treated with RAF inhibitors, the first-generation RAF inhibitor vemurafenib stimulated in vitro and in vivo growth and induced expression of MAPK pathway response genes; by contrast the paradox breakers PLX7904 and PLX8394 had no effect. Paradox breakers also overcame several known mechanisms of resistance to first-generation RAF inhibitors. Dissociating MAPK pathway inhibition from paradoxical activation might yield both improved safety and more durable efficacy than first-generation RAF inhibitors, a concept currently undergoing human clinical evaluation with PLX8394.[1]

C23H19CLF2N4O3S

504.940

504.08345

C, 54.71; H, 3.79; Cl, 7.02; F, 7.53; N, 11.10; O, 9.51; S, 6.35

1652573-86-8

Typically exists as solid at room temperature

O=S(NC1=CC(F)=C(C(C2=CNC3=NC=C(C4=CC=C(Cl)C=C4)C=C32)=O)C(F)=C1)(N(CC)C)=O

LLAFAUCUKNMECC-UHFFFAOYSA-N

InChI=1S/C23H19ClF2N4O3S/c1-3-30(2)34(32,33)29-16-9-19(25)21(20(26)10-16)22(31)18-12-28-23-17(18)8-14(11-27-23)13-4-6-15(24)7-5-13/h4-12,29H,3H2,1-2H3,(H,27,28)

Sulfamide, N'-[4-[[5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1H-pyrrolo[2,3-b]pyridin-3-yl]carbonyl]-3,5-difluorophenyl]-N-ethyl-N-methyl-

PLX 7683; PLX-7683; PLX7683

2934.99.9001

Powder      -20°C    3 years

                     4°C     2 years

In solvent   -80°C    6 months

                  -20°C    1 month

Room temperature (This product is stable at ambient temperature for a few days during ordinary shipping and time spent in Customs)

May dissolve in DMSO (in most cases), if not, try other solvents such as H2O, Ethanol, or DMF with a minute amount of products to avoid loss of samples

Note: Listed below are some common formulations that may be used to formulate products with low water solubility (e.g. < 1 mg/mL), you may test these formulations using a minute amount of products to avoid loss of samples.

---

Injection Formulation 1: DMSO : Tween 80： Saline = 10 : 5 : 85 (i.e. 100 μL DMSO stock solution → 50 μL Tween 80 → 850 μL Saline)
*Preparation of saline: Dissolve 0.9 g of sodium chloride in 100 mL ddH ₂ O to obtain a clear solution.
Injection Formulation 2: DMSO : PEG300 ：Tween 80 : Saline = 10 : 40 : 5 : 45 (i.e. 100 μL DMSO → 400 μLPEG300 → 50 μL Tween 80 → 450 μL Saline)
Injection Formulation 3: DMSO : Corn oil = 10 : 90 (i.e. 100 μL DMSO → 900 μL Corn oil)
Example: Take the Injection Formulation 3 (DMSO : Corn oil = 10 : 90) as an example, if 1 mL of 2.5 mg/mL working solution is to be prepared, you can take 100 μL 25 mg/mL DMSO stock solution and add to 900 μL corn oil, mix well to obtain a clear or suspension solution (2.5 mg/mL, ready for use in animals).

View More

Injection Formulation 4: DMSO : 20% SBE-β-CD in saline = 10 : 90 [i.e. 100 μL DMSO → 900 μL (20% SBE-β-CD in saline)]
*Preparation of 20% SBE-β-CD in Saline (4°C，1 week): Dissolve 2 g SBE-β-CD in 10 mL saline to obtain a clear solution.
Injection Formulation 5: 2-Hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin : Saline = 50 : 50 (i.e. 500 μL 2-Hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin → 500 μL Saline)
Injection Formulation 6: DMSO : PEG300 : castor oil : Saline = 5 : 10 : 20 : 65 (i.e. 50 μL DMSO → 100 μLPEG300 → 200 μL castor oil → 650 μL Saline)
Injection Formulation 7: Ethanol : Cremophor : Saline = 10： 10 : 80 (i.e. 100 μL Ethanol → 100 μL Cremophor → 800 μL Saline)
Injection Formulation 8: Dissolve in Cremophor/Ethanol (50 : 50), then diluted by Saline
Injection Formulation 9: EtOH : Corn oil = 10 : 90 (i.e. 100 μL EtOH → 900 μL Corn oil)
Injection Formulation 10: EtOH : PEG300：Tween 80 : Saline = 10 : 40 : 5 : 45 (i.e. 100 μL EtOH → 400 μLPEG300 → 50 μL Tween 80 → 450 μL Saline)

---

Oral Formulation 1: Suspend in 0.5% CMC Na (carboxymethylcellulose sodium)
Oral Formulation 2: Suspend in 0.5% Carboxymethyl cellulose
Example: Take the Oral Formulation 1 (Suspend in 0.5% CMC Na) as an example, if 100 mL of 2.5 mg/mL working solution is to be prepared, you can first prepare 0.5% CMC Na solution by measuring 0.5 g CMC Na and dissolve it in 100 mL ddH2O to obtain a clear solution; then add 250 mg of the product to 100 mL 0.5% CMC Na solution, to make the suspension solution (2.5 mg/mL, ready for use in animals).

View More

Oral Formulation 3: Dissolved in PEG400
Oral Formulation 4: Suspend in 0.2% Carboxymethyl cellulose
Oral Formulation 5: Dissolve in 0.25% Tween 80 and 0.5% Carboxymethyl cellulose
Oral Formulation 6: Mixing with food powders

---

Note: Please be aware that the above formulations are for reference only. InvivoChem strongly recommends customers to read literature methods/protocols carefully before determining which formulation you should use for in vivo studies, as different compounds have different solubility properties and have to be formulated differently.

---

 (Please use freshly prepared in vivo formulations for optimal results.)