Microbial Metabolite

Metabolism / Metabolites
Enzymes involved in its /caffeic acid/ metabolism have not been identified. In the following, caffeic (CA), chlorogenic (CGA), and dihydrocaffeic (DHCA) acids were incubated with hepatocytes and shown to undergo metabolism by cytochrome P450, catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT), and beta-oxidation enzymes. Ferulic (FA) or dihydroferulic (DHFA) acids, formed as the result of CA- or DHCA-O-methylation by COMT, were also O-demethylated by CYP1A1/2 but not CYP2E1. DHCA or DHFA also underwent side chain dehydrogenation to form CA and FA, respectively, which was prevented by thioglycolic acid, an inhibitor of the beta-oxidation enzyme acyl CoA dehydrogenase. The rates of glutathione conjugate formation catalyzed by NADPH/microsomes (CYP2E1) in decreasing order DHCA>CA>CGA trend which was in reverse order to the rates of their O-methylation by COMT. The CA- and DHCA-o-quinones formed by NADPH/P450 likely inhibited COMT but can readily form glutathione conjugates. CA, DHCA and DHFA were inter-metabolized to each other and to FA by isolated rat hepatocytes whereas FA was metabolized only to CA but not to DHCA or DHFA. CA, DHCA, FA, DHFA and CGA showed a dose-dependent hepatocyte toxicity and the LD(50) (2 h), determined were in decreasing order of effectiveness DHCA>CA>DHFA>CGA>FA. In summary, evidence has been provided that O-methylation, GSH conjugation, hydrogenation and dehydrogenation are involved in the hepatic metabolism of CA and DHCA. The O-methylation pathway for CA and DHCA is a detoxification route whereas o-quinones formation catalyzed by P450 is the toxification route.
In rats, chlorogenic acid is hydrolysed in the stomach and intestine to caffeic and quinic acids. A number of metabolites have been identified. Glucuronides of meta-coumaric acid and meta-hydroxyhippuric acid appear to be the main metabolites in humans. After oral administration of caffeic acid to human volunteers, O-methylated derivatives (ferulic, dihydroferulic and vanillic acids) were excreted rapidly in the urine, while the meta-hydroxyphenyl derivatives appeared later. The dehydroxylation reactions were ascribed to the action of intestinal bacteria.
Caffeic Acid has known human metabolites that include (2S,3S,4S,5R)-6-[5-[(E)-2-carboxyethenyl]-2-hydroxyphenoxy]-3,4,5-trihydroxyoxane-2-carboxylic acid and (2S,3S,4S,5R)-6-[4-[(E)-2-carboxyethenyl]-2-hydroxyphenoxy]-3,4,5-trihydroxyoxane-2-carboxylic acid.

Interactions
Caffeic acid enhanced the uptake of radioactive glucose into C2C12 cells in a concentration-dependent manner. Similar effect of phenylephrine on the uptake of radioactive glucose was also observed in C2C12 cells. Prazosin attenuated the action of caffeic acid in a way parallel to the blockade of phenylephrine.
Female ICR/Ha mice, nine weeks of age, were fed a diet containing 0.06 mmol/g (10 g/kg of diet) caffeic acid (purity, 99%). From experimental day 8, the mice were also given 1 mg benzo(a)pyrene by gavage twice a week for four weeks. The diet containing caffeic acid was removed three days after the last benzo(a)pyrene treatment. Mice were killed at 211 days of age. In the 17 effective mice, the number of forestomach tumors (> or = 1 mm)/mouse (histology unspecified) was significantly decreased by caffeic acid (p < 0.05) (3.1 versus 5.0 tumors/mouse among 38 mice treated with benzo(a)pyrene alone).

[1]. Vendrig J C, Buffel K. Growth-stimulating activity of trans-caffeic acid isolated from Coleus rhenaltianus. Nature, 1961, 192(4799): 276-277.

Caffeic Acid can cause cancer according to The World Health Organization's International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC).
3,4-dihydroxycinnamic acid appears as yellow prisms or plates (from chloroform or ligroin) or pale yellow granules. Alkaline solutions turn from yellow to orange. (NTP, 1992)
Caffeic acid is a hydroxycinnamic acid that is cinnamic acid in which the phenyl ring is substituted by hydroxy groups at positions 3 and 4. It exists in cis and trans forms; the latter is the more common. It has a role as a plant metabolite, an EC 1.13.11.33 (arachidonate 15-lipoxygenase) inhibitor, an EC 2.5.1.18 (glutathione transferase) inhibitor, an EC 1.13.11.34 (arachidonate 5-lipoxygenase) inhibitor, an antioxidant and an EC 3.5.1.98 (histone deacetylase) inhibitor. It is a hydroxycinnamic acid and a member of catechols.
Caffeic Acid has been reported in Salvia miltiorrhiza, Salvia plebeia, and other organisms with data available.
Caffeic Acid is an orally bioavailable, hydroxycinnamic acid derivative and polyphenol, with potential anti-oxidant, anti-inflammatory, and antineoplastic activities. Upon administration, caffeic acid acts as an antioxidant and prevents oxidative stress, thereby preventing DNA damage induced by free radicals. Caffeic acid targets and inhibits the histone demethylase (HDM) oncoprotein gene amplified in squamous cell carcinoma 1 (GASC1; JMJD2C; KDM4C) and inhibits cancer cell proliferation. GASC1, a member of the KDM4 subgroup of Jumonji (Jmj) domain-containing proteins, demethylates trimethylated lysine 9 and lysine 36 on histone H3 (H3K9 and H3K36), and plays a key role in tumor cell development.
Caffeic acid is a metabolite found in or produced by Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
See also: Black Cohosh (part of); Comfrey Root (part of); Arctium lappa Root (part of) ... View More ...

---

Mechanism of Action
Caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE) was synthesized from caffeic acid and phenethyl alcohol (ratio 1:5) at room temperature with dicyclohexyl carbodiimide (DCC) as a condensing reagent. The yield was about 38%. CAPE was found to arrest the growth of human leukemia HL-60 cells. It also inhibits DNA, RNA and protein synthesis in HL-60 cells with IC50 of 1.0 M, 5.0 M and 1.5 M, respectively.
In an attempt to understand the antihyperglycemic action of caffeic acid, the myoblast C2C12 cells were employed to investigate the glucose uptake in the present study. Caffeic acid enhanced the uptake of radioactive glucose into C2C12 cells in a concentration-dependent manner. Similar effect of phenylephrine on the uptake of radioactive glucose was also observed in C2C12 cells. Prazosin attenuated the action of caffeic acid in a way parallel to the blockade of phenylephrine. Effect of caffeic acid on alpha1-adrenoceptors was further supported by the displacement of [3H]prazosin binding in C2C12 cells. Moreover, the glucose uptake-increasing action of phenylephrine in C2C12 cells was inhibited by the antagonists of alpha1A-adrenoceptors, both tamsulosin and WB 4101, but not by the antagonist of alpha1B-adrenoceptors, chlorethylclonidine (CEC). The presence of alpha1A-adrenoceptors in C2C12 cells can thus be considered. Similar inhibition of the action of caffeic acid was also obtained in C2C12 cells co-incubating these antagonists. An activation of alpha1A-adrenoceptors seems responsible for the action of caffeic acid in C2C12 cells. In the presence of U73312, the specific inhibitor of phospholipase C, caffeic acid-stimulated uptake of radioactive glucose into C2C12 cells was reduced in a concentration-dependent manner and it was not affected by U73343, the negative control of U73312. Moreover, chelerythrine and GF 109203X diminished the action of caffeic acid at concentrations sufficient to inhibit protein kinase C. Therefore, the obtained data suggest that an activation of alpha1A-adrenoceptors in C2C12 cells by caffeic acid may increase the glucose uptake via phospholipase C-protein kinase C pathway.
Caffeic acid (CA, 3,4-dihydroxycinnamic acid), at 2% in the diet, had been shown to be carcinogenic in forestomach and kidney of F344 rats and B6C3F1 mice. Based on its occurrence in coffee and numerous foods and using a linear interpolation for cancer incidence between dose 0 and 2%, the cancer risk in humans would be considerable. In both target organs, tumor formation was preceded by hyperplasia, which could represent the main mechanism of carcinogenic action. The dose-response relationship for this effect was investigated in male F344 rats after 4-week feeding with CA at different dietary concentrations (0, 0.05, 0.14, 0.40, and 1.64%). Cells in S-phase of DNA replication were visualized by immunohistochemical analysis of incorporated 5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine (BrdU), 2 hr after intraperitoneal injection. In the forestomach, both the total number of epithelial cells per millimeter section length and the unit length labeling index of BrdU-positive cells (ULLI) were increased, about 2.5-fold, at 0.40 and 1.64%. The lowest concentration (0.05%) had no effect. At 0.14%, both variables were decreased by about one-third. In the kidney, the labeling index in proximal tubular cells also indicated a J-shaped (or U-shaped) dose response with a 1.8-fold increase at 1.64%. In the glandular stomach and in the liver, which are not target organs, no dose-related effect was seen. The data show a good correlation between the organ specificity for cancer induction and stimulation of cell division. With respect to the dose-response relationship and the corresponding extrapolation of the animal tumor data to a human cancer risk, a linear extrapolation appears not to be appropriate.

C9H8O4

180.16

180.042

C, 60.00; H, 4.48; O, 35.52

501-16-6

Caffeic acid; 331-39-5

689043

White to off-white solid powder

1.5±0.1 g/cm3

416.8±35.0 °C at 760 mmHg

211-213ºC (dec.)(lit.)

220.0±22.4 °C

0.0±1.0 mmHg at 25°C

1.707

1.42

3

4

2

13

212

0

C1=CC(=C(C=C1/C=C/C(=O)O)O)O

QAIPRVGONGVQAS-DUXPYHPUSA-N

InChI=1S/C9H8O4/c10-7-3-1-6(5-8(7)11)2-4-9(12)13/h1-5,10-11H,(H,12,13)/b4-2+

(E)-3-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)prop-2-enoic acid

Caffeic acid; AI3-63211

2934.99.9001

Powder      -20°C    3 years

                     4°C     2 years

In solvent   -80°C    6 months

                  -20°C    1 month

Room temperature (This product is stable at ambient temperature for a few days during ordinary shipping and time spent in Customs)

May dissolve in DMSO (in most cases), if not, try other solvents such as H2O, Ethanol, or DMF with a minute amount of products to avoid loss of samples

Note: Listed below are some common formulations that may be used to formulate products with low water solubility (e.g. < 1 mg/mL), you may test these formulations using a minute amount of products to avoid loss of samples.

---

Injection Formulation 1: DMSO : Tween 80： Saline = 10 : 5 : 85 (i.e. 100 μL DMSO stock solution → 50 μL Tween 80 → 850 μL Saline)
*Preparation of saline: Dissolve 0.9 g of sodium chloride in 100 mL ddH ₂ O to obtain a clear solution.
Injection Formulation 2: DMSO : PEG300 ：Tween 80 : Saline = 10 : 40 : 5 : 45 (i.e. 100 μL DMSO → 400 μLPEG300 → 50 μL Tween 80 → 450 μL Saline)
Injection Formulation 3: DMSO : Corn oil = 10 : 90 (i.e. 100 μL DMSO → 900 μL Corn oil)
Example: Take the Injection Formulation 3 (DMSO : Corn oil = 10 : 90) as an example, if 1 mL of 2.5 mg/mL working solution is to be prepared, you can take 100 μL 25 mg/mL DMSO stock solution and add to 900 μL corn oil, mix well to obtain a clear or suspension solution (2.5 mg/mL, ready for use in animals).

View More

Injection Formulation 4: DMSO : 20% SBE-β-CD in saline = 10 : 90 [i.e. 100 μL DMSO → 900 μL (20% SBE-β-CD in saline)]
*Preparation of 20% SBE-β-CD in Saline (4°C，1 week): Dissolve 2 g SBE-β-CD in 10 mL saline to obtain a clear solution.
Injection Formulation 5: 2-Hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin : Saline = 50 : 50 (i.e. 500 μL 2-Hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin → 500 μL Saline)
Injection Formulation 6: DMSO : PEG300 : castor oil : Saline = 5 : 10 : 20 : 65 (i.e. 50 μL DMSO → 100 μLPEG300 → 200 μL castor oil → 650 μL Saline)
Injection Formulation 7: Ethanol : Cremophor : Saline = 10： 10 : 80 (i.e. 100 μL Ethanol → 100 μL Cremophor → 800 μL Saline)
Injection Formulation 8: Dissolve in Cremophor/Ethanol (50 : 50), then diluted by Saline
Injection Formulation 9: EtOH : Corn oil = 10 : 90 (i.e. 100 μL EtOH → 900 μL Corn oil)
Injection Formulation 10: EtOH : PEG300：Tween 80 : Saline = 10 : 40 : 5 : 45 (i.e. 100 μL EtOH → 400 μLPEG300 → 50 μL Tween 80 → 450 μL Saline)

---

Oral Formulation 1: Suspend in 0.5% CMC Na (carboxymethylcellulose sodium)
Oral Formulation 2: Suspend in 0.5% Carboxymethyl cellulose
Example: Take the Oral Formulation 1 (Suspend in 0.5% CMC Na) as an example, if 100 mL of 2.5 mg/mL working solution is to be prepared, you can first prepare 0.5% CMC Na solution by measuring 0.5 g CMC Na and dissolve it in 100 mL ddH2O to obtain a clear solution; then add 250 mg of the product to 100 mL 0.5% CMC Na solution, to make the suspension solution (2.5 mg/mL, ready for use in animals).

View More

Oral Formulation 3: Dissolved in PEG400
Oral Formulation 4: Suspend in 0.2% Carboxymethyl cellulose
Oral Formulation 5: Dissolve in 0.25% Tween 80 and 0.5% Carboxymethyl cellulose
Oral Formulation 6: Mixing with food powders

---

Note: Please be aware that the above formulations are for reference only. InvivoChem strongly recommends customers to read literature methods/protocols carefully before determining which formulation you should use for in vivo studies, as different compounds have different solubility properties and have to be formulated differently.

---

 (Please use freshly prepared in vivo formulations for optimal results.)