N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor, glycine site

(R)-(+)-HA-966 ((+)-HA-966; IV; 10 mg/kg) considerably reduces the effects of systemic NMDA (125, 250, 500, and 1000 mg/kg; iv) on dose-dependent pressor and related tachycardia responses[3]. (+)-HA-966 (30, 100 mg/kg; IP) does not affect dopamine synthesis in the striatum of male BKTO, but it does block amphetamine-induced augmentation of dopamine synthesis in the nucleus accumbens in a dose-dependent manner. Mice (20–30g) showed no effect from increases. [1]

---

1. We evaluated the ability of the functional antagonist at the glycine site of the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor complex, (+)-(1-Hydroxy-3-aminopyrrolodine-2-one) ((+)-HA966), to modulate the antinociceptive action of systemic morphine in a rat model of neuropathic pain produced by chronic constriction injury to the sciatic nerve. Mechanical (vocalization threshold to hindpaw pressure) and thermal (struggle latency to hindpaw immersion into a water bath) stimuli were used. 2. In the mechanical test, morphine (0.05, 0.1 and 0.3 mg kg(-1), i.v.) alone produced dose-dependent effects in both neuropathic and uninjured rats. Likewise, morphine (0.1, 0.3 and 1 mg kg(-1), i.v.) dose-dependently increased struggle latencies of the nerve-injured hindpaw in the hot noxious (46 degrees C) test but was ineffective in the non-noxious warm (44 degrees C) and cold (10 degrees C) test. 3. Pretreatment with (+)-HA966 (2.5 mg kg(-1), s.c.) dose-dependently enhanced the effect of morphine in the mechanical test with the relative potency being nerve-injured hindpaw > contralateral hindpaw > uninjured rat. 4. Likewise, (+)-HA966 dose-dependently enhanced the effect of morphine against a hot (46 degrees C) stimulus and produced, in combination with morphine, a dose-dependent effect against a warm (44 degrees C) stimulus. In the cold (10 degrees C) test, (+)-HA966 reversed the ineffectiveness of the highest dose of morphine. 5. Naloxone blocked the effect of the combination of (+)-HA966 with morphine in all tests. The drug combination produced no motor deficits in animals using the rotarod test. 6. These findings suggest that combined administration of antagonists, acting at the glycine site of the NMDA receptor complex and morphine may be a promising approach in the treatment of neuropathic and acute pain[3].

Animal/Disease Models: SD (SD (Sprague-Dawley)) rats (11 to 12 weeks old) [3]
Doses: 10 mg/kg
Route of Administration: IV
Experimental Results: Dramatically attenuated systemic NMDA-induced dose-dependent pressor and associated tachycardia responses.

---

1. The effects of the glycine/NMDA receptor antagonist, (+)-HA-966 on the neurochemical and behavioural responses to amphetamine have been determined in the mouse and rat. 2. In vehicle-treated control mice, (+)-HA-966 (30-100 mg kg-1) did not affect dopamine synthesis in either the nucleus accumbens or striatum and was without marked effect on spontaneous locomotor activity. 3. In the mouse, (+)-HA-966 (30 and 100 mg kg-1) dose-dependently blocked the enhancement of dopamine synthesis induced in the nucleus accumbens by amphetamine, but was without effect on the increase in dopamine synthesis in the striatum. 4. Intracerebroventricular administration of the glycine/NMDA receptor antagonist, 5,7-dichlorokynurenic acid, in the mouse (10 micrograms) also significantly attenuated amphetamine-enhanced DOPA accumulation in the nucleus accumbens, but not in the striatum. 5. The decrease of dopamine synthesis in striatum and nucleus accumbens induced by the dopamine receptor agonist, apomorphine, was unaffected by (+)-HA-966 (100 mg kg-1). 6. (+)-HA-966 (30 mg kg-1) failed to attenuate the hyperactivity induced by the systemic administration of amphetamine in the mouse, but totally prevented the hyperlocomotion following infusion of amphetamine into the rat nucleus accumbens. In contrast, stereotyped behaviour induced by infusion of amphetamine into the rat striatum was not altered following pretreatment with (+)-HA-966 (30 mg kg-1). 7. The results are consistent with a selective facilitatory role of glycine/NMDA receptors on mesolimbic dopaminergic neurones.[1]

[1]. R-(+)-HA-966, a glycine/NMDA receptor antagonist, selectively blocks the activation of the mesolimbic dopamine system by amphetamine. Br J Pharmacol. 1991 Aug;103(4):2037-44.

[2]. Discriminative stimulus effects of R-(+)-3-amino-1-hydroxypyrrolid-2-one, [(+)-HA-966] a partial agonist of the strychnine-insensitive modulatory site of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1995 Dec;275(3):1267-73.

[3]. The antinociceptive effect of combined systemic administration of morphine and the glycine/NMDA receptor antagonist, (+)-HA966 in a rat model of peripheral neuropathy. Br J Pharmacol. 1998 Dec;125(8):1641-50.

The strychnine-insensitive glycine site on the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor complex is a target for development of a host of therapeutic agents including anxiolytics, antidepressants, antiepileptics, anti-ischemics and cognitive enhancers. In the present experiments, the discriminative stimulus effects of (+)-HA-966 [R-(+)-3-amino-1-hydroxypyrrolid-2-one], a low-efficacy partial agonist of the glycine site, was explored. Male, Swiss-Webster mice were trained to discriminate (+)-HA-966 (170 mg/kg i.p.) from saline in a T-maze under which behavior was controlled by food. Other glycine partial agonists, 1-amino-1-cyclopropanecarboxilic acid and D-cycloserine, fully substituted for the discriminative stimulus effects of (+)-HA-966 despite known differences in other pharmacological effects of these compounds. The glycine site antagonist, 7-chlorkynurenic acid, did not substitute for (+)-HA-966. Likewise other functional NMDA antagonists acting at nonglycine sites of the NMDA receptor also did not substitute: neither the high (dizocilpine) or low affinity (ibogaine) ion-channel blocker, the competitive antagonist, NPC 17742 [2R,4R,5S-2-amino-4,5-(1, 2-cyclohexyl)-7-phosphonoheptanoic acid], nor the polyamine antagonist, ifenprodil, substituted for (+)-HA-966. Although the full agonist, glycine, did not substitute, this compound fully blocked the discriminative stimulus effects of (+)-HA-966. In a separate group of mice trained to discriminate 0.17 mg/kg of dizocilpine from saline, (+)-HA-966 produced a maximum of only 50% dizoclipine-appropriate responses. These data suggest that the discriminative stimulus effects of (+)-HA-966 are based upon its partial agonist actions at the strychnine-insensitive glycine site.[2]

C₄H₈N₂O₂

116.12

116.059

123931-04-4

6603720

Typically exists as Off-white to light yellow solids at room temperature

1.436g/cm3

258.6ºC at 760mmHg

110.2ºC

0.002mmHg at 25°C

1.59

-1.5

2

3

0

8

115

1

N[C@@H]1CCN(O)C1=O

HCKUBNLZMKAEIN-GSVOUGTGSA-N

InChI=1S/C4H8N2O2/c5-3-1-2-6(8)4(3)7/h3,8H,1-2,5H2/t3-/m1/s1

(3R)-3-amino-1-hydroxypyrrolidin-2-one

(R)(+)HA966; (R) (+) HA 966; (R)-(+)-HA-966; 123931-04-4; (3R)-3-amino-1-hydroxypyrrolidin-2-one; (+)-HA-966; (R)-HA-966; R(+)-HA-966; 2N9Q4C7WMT; R(+)-3-Amino-1-hydroxy-2-pyrrolidinone;

2934.99.9001

Powder      -20°C    3 years

                     4°C     2 years

In solvent   -80°C    6 months

                  -20°C    1 month

Room temperature (This product is stable at ambient temperature for a few days during ordinary shipping and time spent in Customs)

H2O : ~100 mg/mL (~861.18 mM)

Note: Listed below are some common formulations that may be used to formulate products with low water solubility (e.g. < 1 mg/mL), you may test these formulations using a minute amount of products to avoid loss of samples.

---

Injection Formulation 1: DMSO : Tween 80： Saline = 10 : 5 : 85 (i.e. 100 μL DMSO stock solution → 50 μL Tween 80 → 850 μL Saline)
*Preparation of saline: Dissolve 0.9 g of sodium chloride in 100 mL ddH ₂ O to obtain a clear solution.
Injection Formulation 2: DMSO : PEG300 ：Tween 80 : Saline = 10 : 40 : 5 : 45 (i.e. 100 μL DMSO → 400 μLPEG300 → 50 μL Tween 80 → 450 μL Saline)
Injection Formulation 3: DMSO : Corn oil = 10 : 90 (i.e. 100 μL DMSO → 900 μL Corn oil)
Example: Take the Injection Formulation 3 (DMSO : Corn oil = 10 : 90) as an example, if 1 mL of 2.5 mg/mL working solution is to be prepared, you can take 100 μL 25 mg/mL DMSO stock solution and add to 900 μL corn oil, mix well to obtain a clear or suspension solution (2.5 mg/mL, ready for use in animals).

View More

Injection Formulation 4: DMSO : 20% SBE-β-CD in saline = 10 : 90 [i.e. 100 μL DMSO → 900 μL (20% SBE-β-CD in saline)]
*Preparation of 20% SBE-β-CD in Saline (4°C，1 week): Dissolve 2 g SBE-β-CD in 10 mL saline to obtain a clear solution.
Injection Formulation 5: 2-Hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin : Saline = 50 : 50 (i.e. 500 μL 2-Hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin → 500 μL Saline)
Injection Formulation 6: DMSO : PEG300 : castor oil : Saline = 5 : 10 : 20 : 65 (i.e. 50 μL DMSO → 100 μLPEG300 → 200 μL castor oil → 650 μL Saline)
Injection Formulation 7: Ethanol : Cremophor : Saline = 10： 10 : 80 (i.e. 100 μL Ethanol → 100 μL Cremophor → 800 μL Saline)
Injection Formulation 8: Dissolve in Cremophor/Ethanol (50 : 50), then diluted by Saline
Injection Formulation 9: EtOH : Corn oil = 10 : 90 (i.e. 100 μL EtOH → 900 μL Corn oil)
Injection Formulation 10: EtOH : PEG300：Tween 80 : Saline = 10 : 40 : 5 : 45 (i.e. 100 μL EtOH → 400 μLPEG300 → 50 μL Tween 80 → 450 μL Saline)

---

Oral Formulation 1: Suspend in 0.5% CMC Na (carboxymethylcellulose sodium)
Oral Formulation 2: Suspend in 0.5% Carboxymethyl cellulose
Example: Take the Oral Formulation 1 (Suspend in 0.5% CMC Na) as an example, if 100 mL of 2.5 mg/mL working solution is to be prepared, you can first prepare 0.5% CMC Na solution by measuring 0.5 g CMC Na and dissolve it in 100 mL ddH2O to obtain a clear solution; then add 250 mg of the product to 100 mL 0.5% CMC Na solution, to make the suspension solution (2.5 mg/mL, ready for use in animals).

View More

Oral Formulation 3: Dissolved in PEG400
Oral Formulation 4: Suspend in 0.2% Carboxymethyl cellulose
Oral Formulation 5: Dissolve in 0.25% Tween 80 and 0.5% Carboxymethyl cellulose
Oral Formulation 6: Mixing with food powders

---

Note: Please be aware that the above formulations are for reference only. InvivoChem strongly recommends customers to read literature methods/protocols carefully before determining which formulation you should use for in vivo studies, as different compounds have different solubility properties and have to be formulated differently.

---

 (Please use freshly prepared in vivo formulations for optimal results.)