Size | Price | Stock | Qty |
---|---|---|---|
1mg |
|
||
5mg |
|
||
10mg |
|
||
50mg |
|
||
Other Sizes |
|
Targets |
SIRT1 (EC50 = 0.10 μM); SIRT1 (EC1.5 = 0.16 μM5); SIRT2 (EC1.5 = 37 μM)
|
||
---|---|---|---|
ln Vitro |
Because SRT 1720 inhibits histone acetyltransferase p300, it effectively lowers p53 acetylation in cells even when SIRT1 is not present [3].
SRT1720 is a selective activator of SIRT1 with an EC50 of 0.16 μM, which is more than 230 times lower than SIRT2 and SIRT3. Here, researchers examined the anti-multiple myeloma (MM) activity of a novel oral agent, SRT1720, which targets SIRT1. Treatment of MM cells with SRT1720 inhibited growth and induced apoptosis in MM cells resistant to conventional and bortezomib therapies without significantly affecting the viability of normal cells. Mechanistic studies showed that anti-MM activity of SRT1720 is associated with: 1) activation of caspase-8, caspase-9, caspase-3, poly (ADP) ribose polymerase; 2) increase in reactive oxygen species; 2) induction of phosphorylated ataxia telangiectasia mutated/checkpoint kinase 2 signalling; 3) decrease in vascular endothelial growth factor-induced migration of MM cells and associated angiogenesis; and 4) inhibition of nuclear factor-κB. Blockade of ATM attenuated SRT1720-induced MM cell death. [2] To determine whether SRT1460 and SRT1720 bind and activate the enzyme at the same molecular site as resveratrol, an isobologram analysis was performed. A concentration matrix of two compounds, resveratrol versus SRT1720 and SRT1720 versus SRT1460, was examined to determine whether the combination was antagonistic, additive or synergistic. In both cases the compound combination resulted in additivity consistent with the hypothesis that a single allosteric site exists on the SIRT1—substrate complex to which structurally diverse compounds can bind (Fig. 2c). [1] |
||
ln Vivo |
Lepob/ob mice treated with SRT 1720 (10, 30, 100 mg/kg, oral) have considerably lower fasting blood glucose levels to nearly normal levels [1]. SRT 1720 is linked to changes in oxidative and fatty acid metabolism as well as protective benefits against diet-induced obesity in rats [3]. SRT 1720 (50–100 mg/kg, orally) lowers arterial oxygen saturation in WT mice and mitigates elastase-induced air gap enlargement and lung function degradation during the development of emphysema [4].
In DIO mice SRT1720 mimics several of the effects observed after calorie restriction including improved insulin sensitivity, normalized glucose and insulin levels, and increased mitochondrial capacity. In addition, in diet-induced obese and genetically obese mice, SRT1720 improves insulin sensitivity, lower plasma glucose, and increase mitochondrial capacity. Thus, SRT1720 is a promising new therapeutic agent for treating diseases of ageing such as type 2 diabetes. Consistent with improved glucose tolerance, the glucose infusion rate required to maintain euglycaemia is approximately 35% higher in SRT1720-treated fa/fa rats, and the total glucose disposal rate is increased by approximately 20%. SRT1720 also prevents multiple myeloma tumor growth. SRT1720 increases the cytotoxic activity of bortezomib or dexamethasone. SIRT1 activation by both genetic overexpression and a selective pharmacological activator, SRT1720, attenuated stress-induced premature cellular senescence and protected against emphysema induced by cigarette smoke and elastase in mice. Ablation of Sirt1 in airway epithelium, but not in myeloid cells, aggravated airspace enlargement, impaired lung function, and reduced exercise tolerance. These effects were due to the ability of SIRT1 to deacetylate the FOXO3 transcription factor, since Foxo3 deficiency diminished the protective effect of SRT1720 on cellular senescence and emphysematous changes. [4] However, whether SIRT1 is a suitable therapeutic target for the treatment of cholestasis is unknown. In the present study, researchers examined the protective effect of SRT1720, which is a specific activator of SIRT1, against 17α-ethinylestradiol (EE)-induced cholestasis in mice. The data demonstrated that SRT1720 significantly prevented EE-induced changes in the serum levels of total bile acids (TBA), total bilirubin (TBIL), γ-glutamyltranspeptidase (γ-GGT) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP). SRT1720 also relieved EE-induced liver pathological injuries as indicated by haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining. SRT1720 treatment protected against EE-induced liver injury through the HNF1α/FXR signalling pathway, which up-regulated the expression of hepatic efflux transporter (Bsep and Mrp2) and hepatic uptake transporters (Ntcp and Oatp1b2). Moreover, SRT1720 significantly inhibited the TNF-α and IL-6 levels induced by EE. These findings indicate that SRT1720 exerts a dose-dependent protective effect on EE-induced cholestatic liver injury in mice and that the mechanism underlying this activity is related to the activation of the HNF1α/FXR signalling pathway and anti-inflammatory mechanisms.[5] |
||
Enzyme Assay |
SIRT1 Fluorescence Polarization Assay and HTS [1]
In the SIRT1 FP assay, SIRT1 activity was monitored using a 20 amino acid peptide (AcGlu-Glu-Lys(biotin)-Gly-Gln-Ser-Thr-Ser-Ser-His-Ser-Lys(Ac)-Nle-Ser-Thr-Glu-Gly– Lys(MR121 or Tamra)-Glu-Glu-NH2) derived from the sequence of p53. The peptide was N-terminally linked to biotin and C-terminally modified with a fluorescent tag. The reaction for monitoring enzyme activity was a coupled enzyme assay where the first reaction was the deacetylation reaction catalyzed by SIRT1 and the second reaction was cleavage by trypsin at the newly exposed lysine residue. The reaction was stopped and streptavidin was added in order to accentuate the mass differences between substrate and product. In total, 290,000 compounds were screened and 127 hits were confirmed. The sensitivity of the FP assay allowed identification of compounds that exhibited low level activation of SIRT1 (≥17% activation at 20 μM) producing multiple classes of activators representing distinct structural classes. The fluorescence polarization reaction conditions were as follows: 0.5 μM peptide substrate, 150 μM βNAD+ , 0-10 nM SIRT1, 25 mM Tris-acetate pH 8, 137 mM Na-Ac, 2.7 mM K-Ac, 1 mM Mg-Ac, 0.05% Tween-20, 0.1% Pluronic F127, 10 mM CaCl2, 5 mM DTT, 0.025% BSA, and 0.15 mM nicotinamide. The reaction was incubated at 37°C and stopped by addition of nicotinamide, and trypsin was added to cleave the deacetylated substrate. This reaction was incubated at 37o C in the presence of 1 μM streptavidin. Fluorescent polarization was determined at excitation (650 nm) and emission (680 nm) wavelengths. Mechanism of action studies [1] The effect of test compounds on the Km of human SIRT1 enzyme for acetylated peptide substrate was examined using the SIRT1 mass spectrometry assay described above. Using the cell-free MS assay, the Km of SIRT1 enzyme for peptide substrate was determined at nine concentrations of compound (100, 33, 11, 3.7, 1.2, 0.41, 0.14, 0.046, and 0.015 μM) and also in the presence of DMSO vehicle alone. To determine the Km, the linear deacetylation rate was determined at 12 concentrations of acetylated peptide substrate (50, 25, 12.5, 6.25, 3.12, 1.56, 0.78, 0.39, 0.19, 0.098, 0.049, and 0.024 μM) for each of the compound concentrations and for the vehicle control. SIRT1 enzyme, 2 mM NAD+ , and 0-50 μM acetylated peptide substrate were incubated with 0-100 μM compound at 25°C. At 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 20, and 25 minutes, the reaction was stopped with 10% formic acid with 50 mM nicotinamide and the conversion of substrates to products determined by mass spectrometry. Isothermal titration Calorimetry (ITC) [1] The human SIRT1-E5c protein (41 μM; described above), the mass spectrometry peptide substrate (1.0 mM), and SRT1460 (0.84 mM) stock solutions were used for the ITC. The buffer conditions were 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 137 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 2 mM TCEP, and 5% glycerol. Titrations were carried out at 26ºC on a VP-ITC. SRT1460 was selected for these studies because it is soluble in buffer to the millimolar concentrations required in the experiment. Isobologram studies [1] The effect of the combination of resveratrol versus SRT1720 and SRT1720 versus SRT1460 was determined using the SIRT1 mass spectrometry assay described above. A concentration matrix of the 2 compounds was created and tested against SIRT1 enzyme. The % conversion of acetylated peptide substrate to deacetylated peptide product was determined at each of the combinations present in the matrix. The resulting Isobologram was used to evaluate the effect of the combination. For the analysis, a plot in Cartesian coordinates of a dose combination that produce the same effect level is the basis for an Isobologram. If two compounds have variable potency, a constant relative potency (R) - which is the amount of compound needed to achieve the same fold activity (e.g. EC1.25 for resveratrol vs SRT1720 and EC2.5 for SRT1720 vs SRT1460) - is selected for the X and Y intercepts for Isobologram analysis. The concentration of both compounds which corresponds to the respective EC value is used as an intercept on both the X and Y axes. Using these two intercepts, a theoretical line called the line of additivity is drawn between the two points. Experimental data obtained by the logarithmic titration of the two compounds mixed as a dose pair in a matrix which yield the same effect level (EC value), is plotted on the Isobologram. Statistical comparison of the line of additivity and the curve arising from experimental two drug dose combinations indicates if an effect is additive. Points falling below and above the line of additivity are subjected to regression analysis. Experimental data that is higher than the line of additivity is interpreted antagonistic and experimental data that is lower is interpreted as synergistic, and experimental data that fall on the line of additivity is considered additive. p53 Deacetylation Assay [1] Human osteosarcoma cells (U-2 OS) were plated at 1.5 X 104 cells per well in 96 well plates. Test compounds and controls (all in 100% DMSO) were added to cell plates after 24 h. To demonstrate the SIRT1-dependence of this assay read-out, replicate plate sets were co-treated with both test compounds and a SIRT1-specific small molecule inhibitor, 6-chloro-2,3,4,9-tetrahydro-1-H-carbazole-1-carboxamide. After compound addition, p53 expression and acetylation was induced by the addition of doxorubicin (1 μg/ml final concentration) to each well. Following p53 induction, cells were fixed and then permeablized with PBS-0.1% Triton-X-100. Non-specific protein binding was then blocked by addition of a solution of 5% BSA in PBS-0.1% TWEEN 20 (Block Solution). Primary antibodies, anti-p53-acetyl-lysine-382 (rabbit polyclonal) and anti-beta tubulin (mouse monoclonal), were diluted 1:400 and 1:1000, respectively, in Block Solution and added to wells for an overnight incubation at 4o C. Wells were then washed in PBS-0.1% TWEEN 20 (Wash Buffer). Secondary antibodies, IR800CW Goat anti-rabbit IgG and Alexa-Fluor 680 goat anti-mouse IgG , were diluted in Block Solution and added to wells for a 1 hr, room temperature incubation. Wells were again washed 5 times in Wash Buffer. Plates were then scanned with a Li-Cor Odyssey infrared scanner. Data was extracted using manufacturer’s software. Signals for both Ac-Lys382-p53 and beta-tubulin were background corrected using wells incubated with only secondary antibodies. Each well Ac-Lys382-signal was then normalized to its corresponding beta-tubulin signal to correct for differences in cell number. These values were then normalized to vehicle to generate the % acetylated p53 value for each well. |
||
Cell Assay |
In situ detection of apoptosis using immunohisto-chemistry (IHC) [2]
Tumours from vehicle (control)- and SRT1720-treated mice were excised and preserved in 10% formalin. Apoptotic cells in tumours were identified by IHC staining for caspase-3 activation, as previously described (Chauhan et al, 2010). In vitro migration and capillary-like tube structure formation assays [2] Transwell Insert Assays were utilized to measure migration as previously described (Podar et al, 2001). In vitro angiogenesis was assessed by Matrigel capillary-like tube structure formation assay (Chauhan et al, 2010). For endothelial tube formation assay, human vascular endothelial cells (HUVECs) were obtained from Clonetics and maintained in endothelial cell growth medium-2 (EGM2 MV SingleQuots) containing 5% FBS. After three passages, HUVEC cell viability was measured with the trypan blue exclusion assay, and <5% of cell death was observed with SRT1720 treatment. Cell viability and apoptosis assays[2] Cell viability was assessed with a colorimetric assay using 3-(4, 5-dimethylthiozol-2-yl)-2, 5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) as described previously (Hideshima et al, 2000). Apoptosis assay was quantified using Annexin V-FITC/Propidium iodide (PI) apoptosis detection kit, as per manufacturer’s instructions , followed by analysis on FACS Calibur. Western blotting and protein quantification[2] Immunoblot analysis was performed using antibodies against caspase-3, caspase-7, caspase-8, caspase-9, poly (ADP) ribose polymerase (PARP), Ace-Lys 382 p53, phosphorylated-ataxia telangiectasia mutated (pATM), phosphorylated- checkpoint kinase 2 (pCHK2), phosphorylated-IκB ser32/36, and GAPDH. Blots were then developed by enhanced chemiluminescence. Densitometry of protein bands was acquired using an AlphaImager EC gel documentation system, and bands were analysed using the spot densitometry analysis tool. |
||
Animal Protocol |
|
||
ADME/Pharmacokinetics |
SRT1720 exhibited a pharmacokinetic profile (Fig. 3a) suitable for in vivo evaluation in both mouse (bioavailability = 50%, terminal t1/2 = ~5 h, Area Under the Curve (AUC) = 7,892 ng h−1 ml−1) and rat (bioavailability = 25%, terminal t1/2 = ~8.4 h, AUC = 3,714 ng h−1 ml−1). SRT501, a reformulated version of resveratrol with improved bioavailability (11% bioavailability, terminal t1/2 of ~ 1 h and an AUC of 10,524 ng h−1 ml−1), was also examined in genetically obese mice (Lepob/ob) and diet-induced obesity (DIO) mice. [1]
|
||
References | |||
Additional Infomation |
Calorie restriction extends lifespan and produces a metabolic profile desirable for treating diseases of ageing such as type 2 diabetes. SIRT1, an NAD+-dependent deacetylase, is a principal modulator of pathways downstream of calorie restriction that produce beneficial effects on glucose homeostasis and insulin sensitivity. Resveratrol, a polyphenolic SIRT1 activator, mimics the anti-ageing effects of calorie restriction in lower organisms and in mice fed a high-fat diet ameliorates insulin resistance, increases mitochondrial content, and prolongs survival. Here we describe the identification and characterization of small molecule activators of SIRT1 that are structurally unrelated to, and 1,000-fold more potent than, resveratrol. These compounds bind to the SIRT1 enzyme-peptide substrate complex at an allosteric site amino-terminal to the catalytic domain and lower the Michaelis constant for acetylated substrates. In diet-induced obese and genetically obese mice, these compounds improve insulin sensitivity, lower plasma glucose, and increase mitochondrial capacity. In Zucker fa/fa rats, hyperinsulinaemic-euglycaemic clamp studies demonstrate that SIRT1 activators improve whole-body glucose homeostasis and insulin sensitivity in adipose tissue, skeletal muscle and liver. Thus, SIRT1 activation is a promising new therapeutic approach for treating diseases of ageing such as type 2 diabetes.[1]
SIRT1 belongs to the silent information regulator 2 (Sir2) protein family of enzymes and functions as a NAD(+) -dependent class III histone deacetylase. Here, we examined the anti-multiple myeloma (MM) activity of a novel oral agent, SRT1720, which targets SIRT1. Treatment of MM cells with SRT1720 inhibited growth and induced apoptosis in MM cells resistant to conventional and bortezomib therapies without significantly affecting the viability of normal cells. Mechanistic studies showed that anti-MM activity of SRT1720 is associated with: (i) activation of caspase-8, caspase-9, caspase-3, poly(ADP) ribose polymerase; (ii) increase in reactive oxygen species; (iii) induction of phosphorylated ataxia telangiectasia mutated/checkpoint kinase 2 signalling; (iv) decrease in vascular endothelial growth factor-induced migration of MM cells and associated angiogenesis; and (v) inhibition of nuclear factor-κB. Blockade of ATM attenuated SRT1720-induced MM cell death. In animal tumour model studies, SRT1720 inhibited MM tumour growth. Finally, SRT1720 enhanced the cytotoxic activity of bortezomib or dexamethasone. Our preclinical studies provide the rationale for novel therapeutics targeting SIRT1 in MM.[2] Although the increased lifespan of our populations illustrates the success of modern medicine, the risk of developing many diseases increases exponentially with old age. Caloric restriction is known to retard ageing and delay functional decline as well as the onset of disease in most organisms. Studies have implicated the sirtuins (SIRT1-SIRT7) as mediators of key effects of caloric restriction during ageing. Two unrelated molecules that have been shown to increase SIRT1 activity in some settings, resveratrol and SRT1720, are excellent protectors against metabolic stress in mammals, making SIRT1 a potentially appealing target for therapeutic interventions. This Review covers the current status and controversies surrounding the potential of sirtuins as novel pharmacological targets, with a focus on SIRT1. [3] Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease/emphysema (COPD/emphysema) is characterized by chronic inflammation and premature lung aging. Anti-aging sirtuin 1 (SIRT1), a NAD+-dependent protein/histone deacetylase, is reduced in lungs of patients with COPD. However, the molecular signals underlying the premature aging in lungs, and whether SIRT1 protects against cellular senescence and various pathophysiological alterations in emphysema, remain unknown. Here, we showed increased cellular senescence in lungs of COPD patients. SIRT1 activation by both genetic overexpression and a selective pharmacological activator, SRT1720, attenuated stress-induced premature cellular senescence and protected against emphysema induced by cigarette smoke and elastase in mice. Ablation of Sirt1 in airway epithelium, but not in myeloid cells, aggravated airspace enlargement, impaired lung function, and reduced exercise tolerance. These effects were due to the ability of SIRT1 to deacetylate the FOXO3 transcription factor, since Foxo3 deficiency diminished the protective effect of SRT1720 on cellular senescence and emphysematous changes. Inhibition of lung inflammation by an NF-κB/IKK2 inhibitor did not have any beneficial effect on emphysema. Thus, SIRT1 protects against emphysema through FOXO3-mediated reduction of cellular senescence, independently of inflammation. Activation of SIRT1 may be an attractive therapeutic strategy in COPD/emphysema. [4] Sirtuin 1 (SIRT1) is the most conserved mammalian NAD+-dependent protein deacetylase and is a member of the silent information regulator 2 (Sir2) families of proteins (also known as Sirtuins). In the liver, hepatic SIRT1 modulates bile acid metabolism through the regulation of farnesoid X receptor (FXR) expression. FXR is one of the most important nuclear receptors involved in the regulation of bile acid metabolism. SIRT1 modulates the FXR expression at multiple levels, including direct deacetylation of this transcription factor and transcriptional regulation through hepatocyte nuclear factor 1α (HNF1α). Therefore, hepatic SIRT1 is a vital regulator of the HNF1α/FXR signalling pathway and hepatic bile acid metabolism. However, whether SIRT1 is a suitable therapeutic target for the treatment of cholestasis is unknown. In the present study, we examined the protective effect of SRT1720, which is a specific activator of SIRT1, against 17α-ethinylestradiol (EE)-induced cholestasis in mice. Our data demonstrated that SRT1720 significantly prevented EE-induced changes in the serum levels of total bile acids (TBA), total bilirubin (TBIL), γ-glutamyltranspeptidase (γ-GGT) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP). SRT1720 also relieved EE-induced liver pathological injuries as indicated by haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining. SRT1720 treatment protected against EE-induced liver injury through the HNF1α/FXR signalling pathway, which up-regulated the expression of hepatic efflux transporter (Bsep and Mrp2) and hepatic uptake transporters (Ntcp and Oatp1b2). Moreover, SRT1720 significantly inhibited the TNF-α and IL-6 levels induced by EE. These findings indicate that SRT1720 exerts a dose-dependent protective effect on EE-induced cholestatic liver injury in mice and that the mechanism underlying this activity is related to the activation of the HNF1α/FXR signalling pathway and anti-inflammatory mechanisms.[5] |
Molecular Formula |
C25H24CLN7OS
|
---|---|
Molecular Weight |
506.0224
|
Exact Mass |
505.145
|
CAS # |
2060259-60-9
|
Related CAS # |
SRT 1720;925434-55-5;SRT 1720 dihydrochloride;2468639-77-0; 925434-55-5; 2060259-60-9 (HCl); 1001645-58-4 (x HCl)
|
PubChem CID |
25232708
|
Appearance |
Brown to reddish brown solid powder
|
Hydrogen Bond Donor Count |
3
|
Hydrogen Bond Acceptor Count |
7
|
Rotatable Bond Count |
5
|
Heavy Atom Count |
35
|
Complexity |
707
|
Defined Atom Stereocenter Count |
0
|
SMILES |
Cl[H].S1C([H])=C(C([H])([H])N2C([H])([H])C([H])([H])N([H])C([H])([H])C2([H])[H])N2C([H])=C(C3=C([H])C([H])=C([H])C([H])=C3N([H])C(C3C([H])=NC4=C([H])C([H])=C([H])C([H])=C4N=3)=O)N=C12
|
InChi Key |
DTGRRMPPXCRRIM-UHFFFAOYSA-N
|
InChi Code |
InChI=1S/C25H23N7OS.ClH/c33-24(22-13-27-20-7-3-4-8-21(20)28-22)29-19-6-2-1-5-18(19)23-15-32-17(16-34-25(32)30-23)14-31-11-9-26-10-12-31;/h1-8,13,15-16,26H,9-12,14H2,(H,29,33);1H
|
Chemical Name |
N-[2-[3-(piperazin-1-ylmethyl)imidazo[2,1-b][1,3]thiazol-6-yl]phenyl]quinoxaline-2-carboxamide;hydrochloride
|
Synonyms |
1001645-58-4; SRT 1720 Hydrochloride; SRT1720 HCl; SRT1720 Hydrochloride; SRT 1720 (Hydrochloride); N-(2-(3-(piperazin-1-ylmethyl)imidazo[2,1-b]thiazol-6-yl)phenyl)quinoxaline-2-carboxamide hydrochloride; SRT1720 xHydrochloride; ...; 2060259-60-9;
|
HS Tariff Code |
2934.99.9001
|
Storage |
Powder -20°C 3 years 4°C 2 years In solvent -80°C 6 months -20°C 1 month Note: Please store this product in a sealed and protected environment (e.g. under nitrogen), avoid exposure to moisture. |
Shipping Condition |
Room temperature (This product is stable at ambient temperature for a few days during ordinary shipping and time spent in Customs)
|
Solubility (In Vitro) |
DMSO : ~62.5 mg/mL (~123.51 mM)
H2O : ~15.7 mg/mL (~31.03 mM) |
---|---|
Solubility (In Vivo) |
Solubility in Formulation 1: ≥ 2.08 mg/mL (4.11 mM) (saturation unknown) in 10% DMSO + 40% PEG300 + 5% Tween80 + 45% Saline (add these co-solvents sequentially from left to right, and one by one), clear solution.
For example, if 1 mL of working solution is to be prepared, you can add 100 μL of 20.8 mg/mL clear DMSO stock solution to 400 μL PEG300 and mix evenly; then add 50 μL Tween-80 to the above solution and mix evenly; then add 450 μL normal saline to adjust the volume to 1 mL. Preparation of saline: Dissolve 0.9 g of sodium chloride in 100 mL ddH₂ O to obtain a clear solution. Solubility in Formulation 2: ≥ 2.08 mg/mL (4.11 mM) (saturation unknown) in 10% DMSO + 90% (20% SBE-β-CD in Saline) (add these co-solvents sequentially from left to right, and one by one), clear solution. For example, if 1 mL of working solution is to be prepared, you can add 100 μL of 20.8 mg/mL clear DMSO stock solution to 900 μL of 20% SBE-β-CD physiological saline solution and mix evenly. Preparation of 20% SBE-β-CD in Saline (4°C,1 week): Dissolve 2 g SBE-β-CD in 10 mL saline to obtain a clear solution. View More
Solubility in Formulation 3: ≥ 1 mg/mL (1.98 mM) (saturation unknown) in 5% DMSO + 40% PEG300 + 5% Tween80 + 50% Saline (add these co-solvents sequentially from left to right, and one by one), clear solution. Solubility in Formulation 4: ≥ 1 mg/mL (1.98 mM) (saturation unknown) in 5% DMSO + 95% (20% SBE-β-CD in Saline) (add these co-solvents sequentially from left to right, and one by one), clear solution. Preparation of 20% SBE-β-CD in Saline (4°C,1 week): Dissolve 2 g SBE-β-CD in 10 mL saline to obtain a clear solution. Solubility in Formulation 5: 10 mg/mL (19.76 mM) in 0.5% HPMC 0.2%Tween80 (add these co-solvents sequentially from left to right, and one by one), Suspened solution; with ultrasonication. |
Preparing Stock Solutions | 1 mg | 5 mg | 10 mg | |
1 mM | 1.9762 mL | 9.8810 mL | 19.7621 mL | |
5 mM | 0.3952 mL | 1.9762 mL | 3.9524 mL | |
10 mM | 0.1976 mL | 0.9881 mL | 1.9762 mL |
*Note: Please select an appropriate solvent for the preparation of stock solution based on your experiment needs. For most products, DMSO can be used for preparing stock solutions (e.g. 5 mM, 10 mM, or 20 mM concentration); some products with high aqueous solubility may be dissolved in water directly. Solubility information is available at the above Solubility Data section. Once the stock solution is prepared, aliquot it to routine usage volumes and store at -20°C or -80°C. Avoid repeated freeze and thaw cycles.
Calculation results
Working concentration: mg/mL;
Method for preparing DMSO stock solution: mg drug pre-dissolved in μL DMSO (stock solution concentration mg/mL). Please contact us first if the concentration exceeds the DMSO solubility of the batch of drug.
Method for preparing in vivo formulation::Take μL DMSO stock solution, next add μL PEG300, mix and clarify, next addμL Tween 80, mix and clarify, next add μL ddH2O,mix and clarify.
(1) Please be sure that the solution is clear before the addition of next solvent. Dissolution methods like vortex, ultrasound or warming and heat may be used to aid dissolving.
(2) Be sure to add the solvent(s) in order.